2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Simulation of an Integrated Ceiling-Partition Wall-Piping System at E-Defense. I: Three-Dimensional Structural Response and Base Isolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical modes were selected according to dominant slab vibration frequencies observed in slab response spectra. The vibration periods of all the vertical modes discussed (Figures 8 and 9) are in agreement with measured frequencies of various slabs reported in Ryan et al 15 Namely, the observed periods of slab vibration modes ranged from about 0.08 seconds at the second floor to 0.13 seconds at the roof (7.7-12.5 Hz). The y-direction was selected because of several sources of stiffness and mass irregularity that were not present in the x-direction (eg, unequal bay widths in y-direction and supplementary mass at the roof level on the east half of the building).…”
Section: Modal Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The vertical modes were selected according to dominant slab vibration frequencies observed in slab response spectra. The vibration periods of all the vertical modes discussed (Figures 8 and 9) are in agreement with measured frequencies of various slabs reported in Ryan et al 15 Namely, the observed periods of slab vibration modes ranged from about 0.08 seconds at the second floor to 0.13 seconds at the roof (7.7-12.5 Hz). The y-direction was selected because of several sources of stiffness and mass irregularity that were not present in the x-direction (eg, unequal bay widths in y-direction and supplementary mass at the roof level on the east half of the building).…”
Section: Modal Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The calibrated damping ratios corresponded loosely to experimentally observed damping ratios during earthquake shaking of the roof slab (first vertical mode) and the fifth floor slab (second vertical mode) as determined in Ryan et al 15 The effect of these calibrations is discussed later in more detail. For both the LRB/CLB and fixed-base models, a constant modal damping of 2.5% was found to give a good match between experimental and numerical results.…”
Section: Numerical Model Of Specimensupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is noted that further evidence is needed to conclude that the vertical acceleration demands observed in the experiments were representative of realistic structural systems (Ryan et al, 2015).…”
Section: -19mentioning
confidence: 99%