2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic stratigraphic framework and depositional history for Cretaceous and Cenozoic contourite depositional systems of the Mozambique Channel, SW Indian Ocean

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lateral upslope migration of M increasingly confines C, and by SU3, exhibits a westward shift into C. In contrast to other giant drifts in the region however, M shows no vertical growth 18 . The deeper AABW/CDW interface at this time appears to have imposed a vertical height limit on the CDS similar to that proposed for the Zambezi drift 11 . Secondary oceanographic processes, such as internal waves at this location, may cause enhanced erosion of the steep basinward flank of M 8 .…”
Section: Dataset and Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The lateral upslope migration of M increasingly confines C, and by SU3, exhibits a westward shift into C. In contrast to other giant drifts in the region however, M shows no vertical growth 18 . The deeper AABW/CDW interface at this time appears to have imposed a vertical height limit on the CDS similar to that proposed for the Zambezi drift 11 . Secondary oceanographic processes, such as internal waves at this location, may cause enhanced erosion of the steep basinward flank of M 8 .…”
Section: Dataset and Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, in the absence of an observed feeder channel (or submarine canyon), and given the clear alongslope orientation and lateral continuity of the depositional and erosional features along the continental rise (rather than in the downslope orientation typically assumed by mixed turbidite-contourite systems), we consider here a pure Contourite Depositional System (CDS) and follow Gruetzner et al (2012) 15 in interpreting M as a large asymmetric mounded drift, because it meets criteria listed in Hernández-Molina et al (2008) 36 . The drift resembles modern drifts offshore of South Africa 37 or along the Mozambique Channel 11 . The M feature also resembles other, coeval, buried asymmetric mounded drifts found further south along the Patagonian margin 18 .…”
Section: Dataset and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The U1 channel-levee complex, which was deposited during the Oligocene, is coeval to the building of the Zambezi giant 1.8 stwt-thick contourite drift on the southern bank of the upper Zambezi Valley (Fig 1B , 20A) (Raisson et al, 2016;Ponte, 2018;Thiéblemont et al, 2020).…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%