2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2005.02716.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic tomography of the Tongariro Volcanic Centre, New Zealand

Abstract: S U M M A R YTomographic inversion of local earthquake P-and S-wave traveltime data is used to investigate 3-D P-wave velocity (V p ) and P-wave/S-wave velocity ratio (V p /V s ) variations at the Tongariro Volcanic Centre (TgVC), New Zealand. P-wave model resolution is generally high throughout the TgVC at depths of around 3-9 km below sea level. Near-surface resolution is lower since rays at shallow depths are predominantly subparallel. Resolution decreases below 12 km depth due to clustering of seismicity a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
39
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is seems likely that the conductive feature continues northward beneath the Tongariro volcano. Such a continuation of this dyke like structure marking the route by which hot gases, and potentially, magma are transported to the volcanic cones is consistent with an observed area of low P-wave velocity at depths down to ∼10 km, noted by Rowlands et al (2005). Their preferred interpretation of this feature was in terms of a hot open conduit beneath Ruapehu, remnant partial melt left over from previous eruptions beneath Ngauruhoe, and the hot source body for the hydrothermal systems on Tongariro, each of which would be characterized by high conductivity.…”
Section: Deep Structuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is seems likely that the conductive feature continues northward beneath the Tongariro volcano. Such a continuation of this dyke like structure marking the route by which hot gases, and potentially, magma are transported to the volcanic cones is consistent with an observed area of low P-wave velocity at depths down to ∼10 km, noted by Rowlands et al (2005). Their preferred interpretation of this feature was in terms of a hot open conduit beneath Ruapehu, remnant partial melt left over from previous eruptions beneath Ngauruhoe, and the hot source body for the hydrothermal systems on Tongariro, each of which would be characterized by high conductivity.…”
Section: Deep Structuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Previous passive‐ and active‐source velocity tomography studies of other volcanoes have found a variety of types of features in the subsurface. Compiling results from 23 active arc volcanoes (Aso [ Sudo and Kong , ], Augustine [ Syracuse et al ., ], Mount Etna [ Aloisi et al ., ; Laigle et al ., ], Mount Fuji [ Nakamichi et al ., ], Great Sitkin [ Pesicek et al ., ], Iwate [ Tanaka et al ., ], Katmai [ Murphy et al ., ], Kirishima [ Tomatsu et al ., ], Klyuchevskoy [ Koulakov et al ., ], Long Valley Caldera [ Seccia et al ., ], Montserrat [ Paulatto et al ., ], Mount St. Helens [ Lees , ; Waite and Moran , ], Naruko [ Nakajima and Hasegawa , ], Nevado del Ruiz [ Londoño and Sudo , ], Okmok [ Masterlark et al ., ; Ohlendorf et al ., ], Popocatépetl [ Berger et al ., ; Kuznetsov and Koulakov , ], Rainier [ Moran et al ., ], Redoubt [ DeShon et al ., ], Taranaki [ Sherburn et al ., ], Tongariro [ Rowlands et al ., ], Tungurahua [ Molina et al ., ], Unzen [ Ohmi and Lees , ], and Vesuvius [ Piana Agostinetti and Chiarabba , ]) show that upper crustal low‐velocity regions, potentially indicative of hotter or melt‐rich areas, are as common as high‐velocity regions, generally interpreted to be cooled basaltic rocks intruded during previous eruptions and near which magma travels to the surface. It is possible that all volcanoes contain both these features, but resolution limitations prevent their observation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications followed in seismology [Claerbout, 1968], in helioseismology [Rickett and Claerbout, 2000] and in acoustics [Lobkis and Weaver, 2001], but it is only in the last decade that this method has received widespread attention within the broader seismological community (see, for example, Wapenaar et al [2008] for a comprehensive overview). [8] In this study, we construct Rayleigh and Love wave phase and group velocity dispersion curves from cross-correlation functions of ambient seismic noise recorded at stations of the Central North Island Passive Seismic Experiment (CNIPSE; 33 stations; 6 months) [Reyners and Stuart, 2002], the Western Central North Island Passive Seismic Experiment (WCNIPSE; 6 stations; 9-11 months) [Greve et al, 2008], the Seismic Tomography Around Ruapehu and Tongariro deployment (START; 28 stations; 5 months) [Rowlands et al, 2005], the RF2004 deployment (7 stations; 10 months) [Bannister et al, 2004] and three permanent broadband stations that started operating in 2001 (see Figure 1). We also include correlations between 20 permanent broadband stations operated by GeoNet (http://www.geonet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%