2021
DOI: 10.3390/buildings11120661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Strengthening of Heritage Timber Buildings: A Review

Abstract: Recent studies highlight the potential impact of earthquakes on cultural heritage sites and monuments, which in turn yield significant adverse impacts on economies, politics, and societies. Several aspects such as building materials, structural responses, and restoration strategies must be considered in the conservation of heritage structures. Timber is an old organic construction material. Most of the historic timber structures were not designed to withstand seismic forces; therefore, the seismic vulnerabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of qualitative and quantitative analytical tools, such as Risk Matrix, Failure mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), Failure Tree Analysis (FTA) (Ram ırez Eudave and Ferreira, 2021), can be used to predict the vulnerability scenarios to assess the vulnerability of the heritage buildings. Seismic vulnerability is commonly assessed (Mondello et al, 2019;Shabani et al, 2021;Aguilar et al, 2023). Other vulnerability analyses include fire occurrence (Agapiou et al, 2016), air pollution (Hadjimitsis et al, 2013), precipitation data and flood events (Skilodimou et al, 2019), sea erosion, salinity and coast exposure (Hadjimitsis et al, 2013;Agapiou et al, 2016).…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of qualitative and quantitative analytical tools, such as Risk Matrix, Failure mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), Failure Tree Analysis (FTA) (Ram ırez Eudave and Ferreira, 2021), can be used to predict the vulnerability scenarios to assess the vulnerability of the heritage buildings. Seismic vulnerability is commonly assessed (Mondello et al, 2019;Shabani et al, 2021;Aguilar et al, 2023). Other vulnerability analyses include fire occurrence (Agapiou et al, 2016), air pollution (Hadjimitsis et al, 2013), precipitation data and flood events (Skilodimou et al, 2019), sea erosion, salinity and coast exposure (Hadjimitsis et al, 2013;Agapiou et al, 2016).…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several decades, finite element (FE) simulation has been widely employed by the scholars to study ancient wood structures [28,29]. Fang et al [30] developed various numerical modeling strategies to explore the mechanical properties of MTJs in traditional wood structures and deduced the average stiffness range of through-mortise joints (TMNs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of structures under seismic loads is characterized by high complexity and nonlinearity, rendering traditional linear analysis methods insufficient in capturing the full extent of their response (Caprili et al, 2012;Sandoli et al, 2021). Consequently, advanced techniques like nonlinear static and dynamic analysis have become imperative for accurately predicting how structures will react to earthquakes (Shabani et al, 2021a;Gönen and Soyöz, 2022). These sophisticated analysis methods empower engineers to design structures that can effectively withstand seismic forces, thereby mitigating the risk of structural failure and safeguarding lives and property (Shabani et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%