2018
DOI: 10.3390/buildings8100137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Vulnerability for RC Infilled Frames: Simplified Evaluation for As-Built and Retrofitted Building Typologies

Abstract: Several studies investigated the influence of infills on the response of reinforced concrete (RC) frames. However, possible shear brittle failures are generally neglected. The interaction between the infill panels and the surrounding frames can lead to anticipated brittle-type failures that should be considered in code-based assessment of lateral seismic capacity. This paper investigates, by means of simplified pushover analyses, on the effect of infills on the lateral seismic capacity explicitly considering p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, brittle failures can occur in columns, beams, and joints due to local interaction. This undesired interaction should be taken into account in seismic assessment [21], also because it occurs during the deformation of the RC frame [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, brittle failures can occur in columns, beams, and joints due to local interaction. This undesired interaction should be taken into account in seismic assessment [21], also because it occurs during the deformation of the RC frame [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five damage states (DSs) are defined compatibly with the EMS-98 scale [76] and expressed in terms of interstory drift ratio (Table 3). Starting from the simplified procedure proposed in Gaetani d'Aragona et al [20], which allows to perform a simplified Pushover analysis by adopting a closed-form procedure, the attainment of EMS98-like DSs [77] are identified during the generation of the pushover curve and transformed in the corresponding interstory drift ratios. The damage states are defined depending on the attainment of local phenomena exhibiting by infill panels (i.e., extension of cracking) or the RC frame (i.e., rebar yielding, buckling, concrete spalling, shear, axial failure, or attainment of maximum chord rotation for ductile members).…”
Section: Results Of Nrhasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to a large amount of information and the remarkable computational effort required, the adoption of simpler methods is generally preferred. In particular, the so-called macro-modeling approach that employs equivalent struts is one of the most adopted in the numerical analysis of infilled frames and widely used in loss estimation framework [9,20] or to generate mechanical-based fragility curves [21]. Different approaches are available in the literature depending on the number, the geometrical configuration of the equivalent struts, and the constitutive models describing the cyclic behavior of infill panels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural analysis should be performed preferably adopting nonlinear response history analyses (NRHA) on detailed finite element models (FEMs). Indeed, although simpler methods, for example push-over based analysis, are also considered for simplified application of the FEMA P-58 approach, 21,26,27 the execution of NRHA allows to specifically consider the site-hazard characteristics and local site conditions that may have a considerable influence on the building response in terms of EDPs. 28 However, when dealing with large-scale assessment, the computational burden required by NRHA performed at the building scale is not acceptable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%