2018
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1498411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Vulnerability of Urban Vernacular Buildings in Nepal: Case of Newari Construction

Abstract: This paper analyzes the seismic vulnerability of vernacular Newari buildings in Nepal. Based on the damage statistics and failure modes recorded during 1934, 1988, 2011, and 2015 earthquakes, damage probability matrices and seismic fragility functions are derived in this paper. Notable seismic features of the Newari buildings are identified and reported using forensic approach. The result of this study highlights that the vernacular Newari buildings are highly vulnerable in the case of minor to major earthqua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Holliday and Grant [15] presented an account of collapsed and survived buildings during the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Similar case studies were also presented by Gautam and Rodrigues [16] for the buildings affected by several earthquakes in Nepal. The Icelandic building damage scenario was presented by Rupakhety et al [17].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Holliday and Grant [15] presented an account of collapsed and survived buildings during the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Similar case studies were also presented by Gautam and Rodrigues [16] for the buildings affected by several earthquakes in Nepal. The Icelandic building damage scenario was presented by Rupakhety et al [17].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Comprehensive projects, such as HAZUS (1999) in the United States and RISK-UE (Mouroux and Brun, 2008) in Europe, provided a good platform for seismic risk assessment based on ground earthquake microzonation and structural seismic vulnerability assessment. The applicability of these frameworks was demonstrated in cities and regions worldwide, including Bucharest (Lungu et al, 2004), Catania (Faccioli et al, 2004), Sofia (Kostov et al, 2004), Thessaloniki (Kappos et al, 2008), Barcelona (Lantada et al, 2010), Coimbra (Vicente et al, 2011), Al-Hoceima (Cherif et al, 2016), Sion and Martigny (Lestuzzi et al, 2016), Bhaktapur (Gautam and Rodrigues, 2018), Kermanshah (Biglari et al, 2018), Timisoara (Mosoarca et al, 2019), and Molise Region of Italy (Chieffo and Formisano, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masonry construction is widespread in both urban and rural settlements worldwide [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. A large number of possible combinations generated by the geometry, nature, and arrangement of units as well as characteristics of mortar depict the variation of strength of strength of masonry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%