2016
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8365.12245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seizing Attention: Devices and Desires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual design elements, however subtle they may be, vie for our “undivided attention” ( Stafford, 2016 ). However, it is not in the scope of this article to elaborate on various possible moderating factors that can be linked to specific, and often subtle, design elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual design elements, however subtle they may be, vie for our “undivided attention” ( Stafford, 2016 ). However, it is not in the scope of this article to elaborate on various possible moderating factors that can be linked to specific, and often subtle, design elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, with image devices shrinking in scale, quickening in speed and bypassing the body almost completely, Ghost and Hollow Lens endeavour to activate a more embodied cognitive awareness in the viewer, as my interaction with various 19th-century moving image devices had facilitated for me. Stafford (2016: 423), in her essay ‘Seizing Attention: Devices and Desires’, addresses the current trend in technologies to make use of our involuntary response mechanisms, causing a decline in conscious attention and awareness. In response to this scarcity of critical attention, Stafford emphasizes the importance of valuing technologies that make us consciously aware that we are attending (p. 425).…”
Section: Decloaking Mechanism and Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, a variety of theoretical standpoints are interwoven to develop an argument for an expanded context of device, image and viewer, and the importance of revealing the device's mechanism. These include Wolfgang Ernst's (2016) discussion of the micro-temporalities of technological devices, Zielinski's (2013) discourse on optics and Barbara Stafford's (2016) call for a more conscious attending when engaging with media devices. Exploring differences between mechanism and device, media archaeology and optical time, the article brings together theses from a range of disciplines such as Paul Virilio and Ernst's discussions on technological speed and human perception, and 19th-century physiologist Étienne-Jules Marey's endeavour to chrono-photographically capture lost time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%