2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-005-0606-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seizing the Opportunity to Create Uncertainty in Learning Mathematics

Abstract: The paper is a reflective account of the design and implementation of mathematical tasks that evoke uncertainty for the learner. Three types of uncertainty associated with mathematical tasks are discussed and illustrated: competing claims, unknown path or questionable conclusion, and non-readily verifiable outcomes. One task is presented in depth, pointing to the dynamic nature of task design, and the added value stimulated by the uncertainty component entailed in the task in terms of mathematical and pedagogi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings that both use of the cognitive conflict in a nonthreatening way and recognizing the multidimensional perspectives that affect the cognitive conflict as a teaching mechanism is important in challenging the mathematical beliefs of prospective teachers'. Similar observations were also made by Hadas et al (2000); Zaslavsky (2005); Lee et al (2003);Fraser (2007); and Stylianides and Stylianides (2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The findings that both use of the cognitive conflict in a nonthreatening way and recognizing the multidimensional perspectives that affect the cognitive conflict as a teaching mechanism is important in challenging the mathematical beliefs of prospective teachers'. Similar observations were also made by Hadas et al (2000); Zaslavsky (2005); Lee et al (2003);Fraser (2007); and Stylianides and Stylianides (2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In Ref. [24], Engle developed the notion further, building on Zaslavsky's ideas in mathematics education, to define problematizing as "any individual or collective action that encourages disciplinary uncertainties" [25]. Engle's work is the clearest we have found to describe problematizing as a part of students' engagement in science.…”
Section: B Attention To Students' Formulating Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explore teachers' gravitation towards certain types of didactical practice, crucially, in the light of 1 and 2 and through the type of feedback they state they would provide to the student (for example, in terms of how they employ exemplification as a means for explanation, illustration etc. (Zaslavsky 2005)). …”
Section: Task Structurementioning
confidence: 99%