1997
DOI: 10.1007/s003920050060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sekundärprävention der koronaren Herzkrankheit auf dem Prüfstand (Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: Ideal versus reality in the Münster EUROASPIRE study population Ergebnisse der EUROASPIRE-Studie in der Region Münster)

Abstract: The goals of secondary prevention have not been achieved in the region of Münster-there is clearly room for improvement. Considering the treatment of patients with CHD, the recommended strategies of secondary prevention need to be applied more intensively in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study population of EUROA-SPIRE I and II in the region of Münster has been described in detail elsewhere [14,15]. Briefly, patients up to 70 years of age hospitalised for CHD were identified retrospectively from hospital records by one of the following discharge diagnoses: (a) first coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), (b) first percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) without previous CABG, (c) first or recurrent acute myocardial infarction, and (d) first or recurrent acute myocardial ischemia without signs of infarction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study population of EUROA-SPIRE I and II in the region of Münster has been described in detail elsewhere [14,15]. Briefly, patients up to 70 years of age hospitalised for CHD were identified retrospectively from hospital records by one of the following discharge diagnoses: (a) first coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), (b) first percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) without previous CABG, (c) first or recurrent acute myocardial infarction, and (d) first or recurrent acute myocardial ischemia without signs of infarction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%