2021
DOI: 10.3390/met11020302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selected Aspects of Cohesive Zone Modeling in Fracture Mechanics

Abstract: This review paper discusses the basic problems related to the use of cohesive models to simulate the initiation and development of failure in various types of engineering issues. The most commonly used cohesive zone models (CZMs) are described. Recent achievements in the field of cohesive modeling are characterized, with particular emphasis on the problem of mixed mode loading, the influence of the strain rate, the stress state triaxiality, and fatigue. A separate chapter of the work is devoted to the identifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of the traction-separation laws (TSLs) described in the literature are presented in Figure 3. [37]; (b) Bažant [38]; (c) Needleman [39]; (d) Needleman [40]; (e) Tvergaard and Hutchinson [41], reproduced from [42].…”
Section: Void Nucleation At Second Phase Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of the traction-separation laws (TSLs) described in the literature are presented in Figure 3. [37]; (b) Bažant [38]; (c) Needleman [39]; (d) Needleman [40]; (e) Tvergaard and Hutchinson [41], reproduced from [42].…”
Section: Void Nucleation At Second Phase Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author of [39] also pointed out that, in the case of the numerical evaluation of the void nucleation strain, interpretation ambiguities appear because the moment of nuclea-Figure 3. Traction-separation laws (TSLs) proposed in the literature: (a) Hillerborg [37]; (b) Bažant [38]; (c) Needleman [39]; (d) Needleman [40]; (e) Tvergaard and Hutchinson [41], reproduced from [42].…”
Section: Void Nucleation At Second Phase Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2c). Once the displacement jump reaches the critical value ẟc, the element fractures and cannot withstand any stress, resulting in the total energy dissipation of Gc [20].…”
Section: Interface Failure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exemplary values of local fracture and separation stresses, quoting from [36] are summarized in Table 1. Significant progress in the field of numerical methods made it possible to perform a multi-parameter analysis of the matrix and particle separation using cohesive models, which usually characterize the interfacial contact using three groups of parameters: maximum stress (normal and shear), separation work Γ, and displacement δ [40,41]. Although the values of cohesive parameters are often treated as material constants, as indicated in [42], their values depend on the stress triaxiality, specimen geometry, and particle size.…”
Section: Void Nucleation In Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%