1982
DOI: 10.2514/3.44814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selected results from the quiet short-haul research aircraft flight research program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Posey et al [70] leveraged a DP system on a twin-fuselage platform and projected a low-frequency (f ≤ 320 Hz) reduction in noise of 20 dB across large community areas. A similar noise shielding approach was utilized in the development of the Quiet Short-Haul Research Aircraft vehicle developed by NASA [71][72][73][74][75]. Flight-test results from this research aircraft campaign demonstrated noise levels of 90 EPNdB as measured at a sideline of 500 ft, which for the time was considerably lower than comparable jet transport aircraft [72].…”
Section: Distributed Electric Propulsion Enabled Noise Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Posey et al [70] leveraged a DP system on a twin-fuselage platform and projected a low-frequency (f ≤ 320 Hz) reduction in noise of 20 dB across large community areas. A similar noise shielding approach was utilized in the development of the Quiet Short-Haul Research Aircraft vehicle developed by NASA [71][72][73][74][75]. Flight-test results from this research aircraft campaign demonstrated noise levels of 90 EPNdB as measured at a sideline of 500 ft, which for the time was considerably lower than comparable jet transport aircraft [72].…”
Section: Distributed Electric Propulsion Enabled Noise Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the calculations for the blown flaps, the results were compared to data from the QSRA. Flight test data from the QSRA [9,10,30,31] were used to compare the lift coefficients achieved by the QSRA and those computed for the Cardinal. Maximum lift coefficients for the Cardinal were 4-5 in the takeoff configuration and 10-12 in the landing configuration.…”
Section: High Lift and Powered Lift Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the lift augmentation systems influence the flow conditions downstream of the wing in the region of the tail plane. Investigations of similar aircraft configurations suggest that the aircraft's stability can be negatively affected [5], even though the impact is rarely documented [6], [7], [8]. In particular, detailed information about the origin of the change in the stability behavior is lacking due to the experimental character of these investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%