1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-93087-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selected Topics of the Theory of Chemical Elementary Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest and computationally least expensive way of incorporating nonadiabatic effects is by describing nuclear motion by classical mechanics and only the electrons quantum mechanically. In these so-called mixed quantum-classical approaches (often also referred to as semiclassical approaches), [139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148] the atomic nuclei follow some trajectory R(t) while the electronic motion is captured by some timedependent total wavefunction Ψ(r; t) satisfying the time-dependent electronic Schrödinger equation…”
Section: Time-dependent Density Functional Response Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest and computationally least expensive way of incorporating nonadiabatic effects is by describing nuclear motion by classical mechanics and only the electrons quantum mechanically. In these so-called mixed quantum-classical approaches (often also referred to as semiclassical approaches), [139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148] the atomic nuclei follow some trajectory R(t) while the electronic motion is captured by some timedependent total wavefunction Ψ(r; t) satisfying the time-dependent electronic Schrödinger equation…”
Section: Time-dependent Density Functional Response Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to nonadiabatic theory, [30] an important criterion controlling the efficiency of nonradiative S 1 !S 0 decay back to the ground state, thus affecting the quantum yield of the opto-mechanical switching process, is the S 1 -S 0 energy gap (E gap ) at a given instantaneous configuration. In order to extract trends relating to the efficiency of nonradiative decay pathways at the different elongations, we computed the time averages E gap over the 0.5 ps excited-state trajectories for simulations starting from both isomers (Figure 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows we concentrate our discussion mainly on the problems connected with steps I and 11, and to simplify matters, we adopt an electronically adiabatic approximation, i.e., one fixed electronic state i of the whole interacting system. In the (pointwise) generation of the potential energy functions U,(X) = VM(X) + E f ( X ) (2) for chosen sets X = {X,,X2, . .…”
Section: A + B -C + Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reduces the rate constants by about one order of magnitude or more. Finally we replace the theoretical value of the bond dissociation energy by the experimental one, thus eliminating the major part of the deficiency (2). A selected number of adiabatic rovibrational terms constructed in such a scheme is shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Unimolecular Fragmentation: C -H Bond Breaking In Ch the Simentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation