1981
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.27.2.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting a Portfolio of Solar Energy Projects Using Multiattribute Preference Theory

Abstract: This article reports a procedure developed to assist the U.S. Department of Energy in selecting a portfolio of solar energy applications experiments. The procedure has also been used in other government procurements and appears to be applicable in a variety of project funding processes. The technical quality of each proposed applications experiment was summarized through the use of multiple evaluation measures, or attributes. These were combined into a single index of the overall technical quality of an experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Parnell (2006) compares 10 single-decision applications (similar to our installation model) and 14 portfolio decision value model (similar to our portfolio model) applications. Additional portfolio decision models include Golabi et al (1981), Archer and Ghasemzadeh (1999), Kleinmuntz and Kleinmuntz (1999), and Stummer and Heidenberger (2003 We reviewed army, DoD, and joint service militaryrelated documents and published reviews (e.g., Government Accountability Office, RAND Corporation, etc. ), focusing on defense transformation, stationing, and BRAC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parnell (2006) compares 10 single-decision applications (similar to our installation model) and 14 portfolio decision value model (similar to our portfolio model) applications. Additional portfolio decision models include Golabi et al (1981), Archer and Ghasemzadeh (1999), Kleinmuntz and Kleinmuntz (1999), and Stummer and Heidenberger (2003 We reviewed army, DoD, and joint service militaryrelated documents and published reviews (e.g., Government Accountability Office, RAND Corporation, etc. ), focusing on defense transformation, stationing, and BRAC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After questioning the Army Basing Study installation experts, it was fairly straightforward to Golabi et al (1981), we are able to make simplifying assumptions for the assessment process by decomposing the set of attributes for a particular installation such that each expert only needs to assess the set of M attributes x 1j x 2j…”
Section: Value Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin with an illustrative example to introduce the standard framework for multiobjective portfolio decision analysis by Golabi et al (1981). The example is based on pilot projects carried out in Finland in which public funds were used to purchase privately owned forest sites for conservation for a fixed period of some 10-20 years.…”
Section: Preliminary Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selecting which portfolio of project candidates (e.g., products, infrastructure investments, research programmes, policy options) to implement with the available resources is an important decision problem both in public administration and private companies (e.g., Golabi et al 1981, Ewing Jr. et al 2006, Liesiö et al 2007, Kleinmuntz 2007, Phillips and Bana e Costa 2007, Grushka-Cockayne et al 2008. Maximizing the value of a project portfolio is often complicated by multiple value criteria and a large number of alternative portfolios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation