Selecting and applying quantification models for ecosystem services to forest ecosystems in South Korea

Choi, Hyun Duck; Lee, Woo‐Kyun; Song, Cholho; Forsell, Nicklas; Jeon, Seong Woo; Kim, Joon Soon; Kim, So Ra

doi:10.1007/s11676-016-0259-5

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Japan estimates the bird population size in the forest based on the density of the forest that forms bird habitat. The area of each forest forms a biodiversity indicator, and then its value is calculated based on the price of artificial feeding bait, whereas South Korea's biodiversity value is based on the sum of the value of wild bird conservation, and that of hunting activities [31,65].…”

Section: Development For Biodiversity Assessment Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services in Taiwan

Lin

Chiou

Chan

et al. 2021

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Forest is the largest ecosystem in the land area of Taiwan. In the past, most of the studies on the evaluation of forest ecosystem services were regional, and therefore lacked national assessment. This study uses a market value method and a benefit transfer method to assess the value of the forest ecosystem services in Taiwan, and expounds the link between ecosystem services and the effectiveness of forestry management and conservation. Preliminarily, it is estimated that the total value of forest ecosystem services in 2016 was approximately NT $749,278 million (equal to approximately 47.6 billion U.S. dollars, PPP-corrected), accounting for 4.28% of the GDP in 2016. The quotation of unit price data has a huge impact on the final assessment results of forest ecosystem service value, and therefore it is necessary use it appropriately.

show abstract

Section: Development For Biodiversity Assessment Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services in Taiwan

Lin

Chiou

Chan

et al. 2021

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Specifically, these are categorized into eight groups: nature-based solutions, which arise from avoiding the conversion of natural areas, reducing the impact of disturbance on ecosystem GHG emissions through better management and ecological restoration [11,37]; ecosystem-based wetland management, which aims to protect and enhance the sustainability, diversity, and productivity of wetland [38]; peatland management; restoration; agroforestry; built infrastructure; peat wetting infrastructure; and rehabilitation. Additionally, this study reviewed peatland ecosystem service assessments, suggesting an examination of the potential impact on ecosystem services and peatland conservation, adapted from Burkhard et al [24], Choi et al [39], and Maes et al [40].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Synthesizing Recent Trends in Interventions and Key Ecosystem Services in Indonesian Peatland

Choi,

Song,

Lim

et al. 2024

Land

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study conducted a systematic literature review focusing on peatlands studies in Southeast Asia, specifically in Jambi, South Sumatra, and the Riau province of Indonesia, covering the period from 2001 to 2023. To ensure the quality and rigor of the analyzed articles, a critical process and systematic review were employed. Journal articles were extracted using reputable resources, including Google Scholar and Scopus, to enhance the validity and reliability of the research results. We identified significant research topics based on region, province, and sector. Additionally, we synthesized the existing classification of ecosystem services, drawing on previous studies conducted in Indonesia. These services were categorized as provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting services. We also reviewed the classification of ecosystem service types based on peatland degradation and restoration. This study identified evidence of peatland intervention to evaluate ecosystem services in Indonesia. We found that large-scale cultivation and production of palm oil, local policies, and forest fires were the main intervening factors in Indonesian peatlands. Furthermore, Indonesian peatlands have undergone conversion to oil palm, timber, and crop plantations. It is imperative to substantiate the effectiveness of future peatland restoration plans and further refine the quantification of services provided by peatland ecosystems through cooperative projects.

show abstract