2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting and Testing Environmental Enrichment in Lemurs

Abstract: Environmental enrichment has become a standard tool for improving the welfare of animals in zoos. Two critical steps in the manipulation of environmental enrichment are (1) selection of objects/procedures and (2) evaluation of their effects. In this study, we examined the selection and evaluation of feeding enrichment for four species of lemur. Experiment 1 used a paired-choice preference assessment to divide eight food items into high- and low-preferred categories. Experiment 2 separately assessed the effects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, this measure has been used in the zoo environment, but studies can vary greatly based on methodologies, specifically, the structure of the preference assessment and the ultimate goal of the study. Zoo researchers may use novel forms of technology for assessment (Hopper, Egelkamp, Fidino, & Ross, 2019; Huskisson, Jacobson, Egelkamp, Ross, & Hopper, 2020) or use one of the numerous adaptations of this measure (Dorey, Mehrkam, & Tacey, 2015; Fay & Miller, 2015; Fernandez & Timberlake, 2019; Fernandez, Dorey, & Rosales‐Ruiz, 2004; Gaalema et al, 2011; Mehrkam & Dorey, 2014, 2015; Roane, Vollmer, Ringdahl, & Marcus, 1998). In the past, researchers have conducted food preference assessment to discover favored items to be used as reinforcers for positive reinforcement training (Fernandez et al, 2004; Gaalema et al, 2011; Martin, Franklin, Perlman, & Bloomsmith, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, this measure has been used in the zoo environment, but studies can vary greatly based on methodologies, specifically, the structure of the preference assessment and the ultimate goal of the study. Zoo researchers may use novel forms of technology for assessment (Hopper, Egelkamp, Fidino, & Ross, 2019; Huskisson, Jacobson, Egelkamp, Ross, & Hopper, 2020) or use one of the numerous adaptations of this measure (Dorey, Mehrkam, & Tacey, 2015; Fay & Miller, 2015; Fernandez & Timberlake, 2019; Fernandez, Dorey, & Rosales‐Ruiz, 2004; Gaalema et al, 2011; Mehrkam & Dorey, 2014, 2015; Roane, Vollmer, Ringdahl, & Marcus, 1998). In the past, researchers have conducted food preference assessment to discover favored items to be used as reinforcers for positive reinforcement training (Fernandez et al, 2004; Gaalema et al, 2011; Martin, Franklin, Perlman, & Bloomsmith, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should consider the behavioral welfare implications of pool use, as well as the possibility of increasing both pool use and general activity through events such as pool temperature regulation, environmental enrichment, and husbandry training. Preferences for pool and land temperatures could be directly assessed through preference assessments, which could give hippos choices in exhibit spaces used based on such area temperature differences [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Likewise, other studies have investigated the use of training interactions combined with enrichment to increase time spent swimming in zoo-housed penguins [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as suffering is usually considered more morally urgent than pleasure, prevention of the suffering experienced through the frustration of highly motivated actions and behaviours would typically take priority. There are a number of initiatives that can help provide additional choice to captive animals, including exhibit rotations [91], technological innovations such as animal-operated sensors [64,92], and the use of preference tests to allow animals to choose their preferred dietary and enrichment items [93,94].…”
Section: Freedom As An Instrumental Goodmentioning
confidence: 99%