1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00011.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting communication media for distributed communities

Abstract: Within the 'Virtual Mobility and Distributed Laboratories' project three naturalistic case studies of distributed research communities were conducted with a focus on the communication media used. The findings provide insight into relationships between the different media that the communities selected, and the different activities to which these media contributed. It is suggested that these findings are also relevant for distributed groups in which collaborative learning is the primary aim. A framework is prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wiesenberg and Hutton (1996) identified three major challenges for the designer: increased time for delivery of the course (they estimate two or three times what is necessary for a traditional course), creating a on-line community, and encouraging students to become independent learners. Heeren and Lewis (1997) suggest matching the media with the task, keeping lean media (for example, e-mail) for tasks that do not require much interaction, and reserving rich media for things that require more interaction and broader spectrum of activity (face-to-face). Reid and Woolf (1996) discuss the benefits of integrating on-line components into traditional classes, such as accessibility, learner control, heightened communication, access to worldwide resources, and the potential for a more student-centered environment.…”
Section: Lessons From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wiesenberg and Hutton (1996) identified three major challenges for the designer: increased time for delivery of the course (they estimate two or three times what is necessary for a traditional course), creating a on-line community, and encouraging students to become independent learners. Heeren and Lewis (1997) suggest matching the media with the task, keeping lean media (for example, e-mail) for tasks that do not require much interaction, and reserving rich media for things that require more interaction and broader spectrum of activity (face-to-face). Reid and Woolf (1996) discuss the benefits of integrating on-line components into traditional classes, such as accessibility, learner control, heightened communication, access to worldwide resources, and the potential for a more student-centered environment.…”
Section: Lessons From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it seems likely that while team members still need to coordinate their actions, they can do so using leaner media to save the time and effort that would have to be devoted to meeting face-to-face. In fact, as Heeren and Lewis (1997) argue, in situations where a shared understanding has already been developed, leaner media are both more effective and efficient than richer media. They further assert that teams transition from more intentional levels of group activity, such as the development of a shared understanding to a functional level, where plans are developed to an operational level, where activities are carried out according to those plans.…”
Section: H2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research suggests that effects of computer-mediated communication on team performance are dependent upon contextual variables such as phases of team development (Maruping & Agarwal, 2004), the nature of the team's task (Heeren & Lewis, 1997), the project phase (Green, Mazzuchi, & Sarkani, 2010), or team composition (Lau & Murnighan, 2005). Team composition in terms of team members' demographic attributes has been discussed to shape the social context of a team and, thus, facilitate or hinder team processes (Joshi & Roh, 2009).…”
Section: Faultlines As a Contextual Factormentioning
confidence: 99%