2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting design strategies using multi-criteria decision making to improve the sustainability of buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…38.6% of the analysed contributions (32 papers) are devoted to assess the sustainability of different aspects related to the design of buildings. While some authors have focused on the design assessment of particular elements of the building structure, such as slabs [19,20], columns [21], and beams [22], others pay attention to the sustainable design of building envelopes [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Pons and Aguado [32], Akadiri et al [33], Motuziene et al [34], Samani et al [35], and Nassar et al [36] also compare the sustainability of the application of different construction materials to buildings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…38.6% of the analysed contributions (32 papers) are devoted to assess the sustainability of different aspects related to the design of buildings. While some authors have focused on the design assessment of particular elements of the building structure, such as slabs [19,20], columns [21], and beams [22], others pay attention to the sustainable design of building envelopes [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Pons and Aguado [32], Akadiri et al [33], Motuziene et al [34], Samani et al [35], and Nassar et al [36] also compare the sustainability of the application of different construction materials to buildings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the above, only 4 out of the 83 reviewed papers (4.8%) follow the ISO methodology, explicitly defining an adequate functional unit and the system boundaries assumed in the assessment [20,34,35,70]. Although not strictly following the ISO methodology, other authors do explicitly define the functional unit and system boundaries [30,82,87,93,94].…”
Section: Impact Assessment and Selection Of Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The need for qualitative assessment remains relevant for their data information. Compared to traditional methods, it is easier to evaluate elements such as justice, qualitative variables and social aspects using MCDM methods (Baušys et al, 2008;Yazdani-Chamzini et al, 2017;Sierra et al, 2018;Invidiata et al, 2018;Yan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the life cycle of buildings and constructions [4], they should save energy and be safe for human health. The energy of building materials is an important factor for the new energy-efficient building system [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%