2011
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1109.2230
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting High-Precision Photometry on Uniform Zero Points for Five Benchmark Galactic Clusters

Abstract: This paper reviews results from two projects designed to yield photometry on uniform zero points for five clusters-Coma, the Hyades, M67, NGC 752, and Praesepe. Contributing papers for a project on Cousins VRI photometry and a project on Strömgren-β photometry are listed. Results of zero point tests of the photometry are reviewed, and their character is found to be satisfactory at the level of a few mmag. Responses to extant criticisms of the photometry are offered, and a section on B − V photometry for the fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical focus of current and future cluster comparisons is the need to ensure that all cluster photometry is on a common system, supplying confidence that differences among the indices between clusters are signatures of true differences in the relative cluster parameters rather than by-products of calibration offsets. Fortunately, the two clusters of interest have been exhaustively investigated in a series of papers designed specifically to detect and minimize any zero-point differences in broadband VRI (Joner et al 2008;Taylor et al 2008;Taylor & Joner 2011) and uvbyHβ (Joner & Taylor 1995, 1997 photometry. As with NGC 752 (Paper I), we will first compile a set of internal M67 uvbyCaHβ photoelectric standards tied to the established systems.…”
Section: Transforming the Ccd Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical focus of current and future cluster comparisons is the need to ensure that all cluster photometry is on a common system, supplying confidence that differences among the indices between clusters are signatures of true differences in the relative cluster parameters rather than by-products of calibration offsets. Fortunately, the two clusters of interest have been exhaustively investigated in a series of papers designed specifically to detect and minimize any zero-point differences in broadband VRI (Joner et al 2008;Taylor et al 2008;Taylor & Joner 2011) and uvbyHβ (Joner & Taylor 1995, 1997 photometry. As with NGC 752 (Paper I), we will first compile a set of internal M67 uvbyCaHβ photoelectric standards tied to the established systems.…”
Section: Transforming the Ccd Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical focus of current and future cluster comparisons is the need to ensure that all cluster photometry is on a common system, supplying confidence that differences among the indices between clusters are signatures of true differences in the relative cluster parameters rather than byproducts of calibration offsets. Fortunately, the two clusters of interest have been exhaustively investigated in a series of papers designed specifically to detect and minimize any zero-point differences in broad-band VRI (Joner et al 2008;Taylor, Joner, & Jeffery 2008;Taylor & Joner 2011) and uvbyHβ (Joner & Taylor 1995, 1997 photometry. As with NGC 752 (Paper I), we will first compile a set of internal M67 uvbyCaHβ photoelectric standards tied to the established systems.…”
Section: Transforming the Ccd Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%