2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0352-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting low-cost 3D printers using the AHP method: a case study

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present a selection method based on analytic hierarchy process in the form of a case study, which benefits from quantitative data to assess the performance of low-cost 3D printers. The market of personal 3D printers has experienced a major boost in the last decade, with an apparently ever-increasing number of companies producing and selling machines. The huge variety of models available under $5000 has turned the selection of 3D printers into a complex task, often involving mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another three-step approach for implementing AHP was proposed in [15] for selecting low-cost 3D printers. In the first step, the structure of AHP is defined and used for determining the weights of the criteria.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another three-step approach for implementing AHP was proposed in [15] for selecting low-cost 3D printers. In the first step, the structure of AHP is defined and used for determining the weights of the criteria.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performed approach was used to compare three printers in the low-cost segment. The quality characteristics of the surface roughness, dimensional accuracy, and geometric accuracy were measured using a self-developed sample [14]. An adaptive benchmarking approach was developed by Spitaels et al, which was used to compare two printers [15].…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Justino Netto et al (2019) used the AHP algorithm to select low-cost Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) printers (<$5,000). Lukic et al (2017) developed a MCDM system for manufacturing process selection.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%