2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/823/1/59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting M Giants With Infrared Photometry: Distances, Metallicities, and the Sagittarius Stream

Abstract: Using a spectroscopically confirmed sample of M-giants, M-dwarfs and quasars from the LAMOST survey, we assess how well WISE & 2MASS color-cuts can be used to select M-giant stars. The WISE bands are very efficient at separating M-giants from M-dwarfs and we present a simple classification that can produce a clean and relatively complete sample of M-giants. We derive a new photometric relation to estimate the metallicity for M-giants, calibrated using data from the APOGEE survey. We find a strong correlation b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the top panel of the Figure 11 and 12, the K-giants show that faint and bright stream are also different in V Y and metallicity, bright stream is obviously higher in V Y and metallicity than faint stream, and in bottom panels of Figure 11 and 12, BHBs also show a similar result. The M-giants members almost only cover on bright stream, which is consistent with the result found in Li et al (2016). To examine the difference of V Y and metallicity between faint and bright stream appeared in K-giants and BHBs sample, in Figure 13 and 14, we divide the bifurcation into leading bright, faint stream and trailing bright, faint stream according to the dash-dotted line in Figure 10.…”
Section: Bifurcations In Sagittarius Streamsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the top panel of the Figure 11 and 12, the K-giants show that faint and bright stream are also different in V Y and metallicity, bright stream is obviously higher in V Y and metallicity than faint stream, and in bottom panels of Figure 11 and 12, BHBs also show a similar result. The M-giants members almost only cover on bright stream, which is consistent with the result found in Li et al (2016). To examine the difference of V Y and metallicity between faint and bright stream appeared in K-giants and BHBs sample, in Figure 13 and 14, we divide the bifurcation into leading bright, faint stream and trailing bright, faint stream according to the dash-dotted line in Figure 10.…”
Section: Bifurcations In Sagittarius Streamsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There is no distance error of individual LAM-OST M-giant either. Li et al (2016) declared a typical distance precision of 20%. LAMOST M-giants have a typical radial velocity error of about 5 km s −1 (Zhong et al 2015), a median error of 0.17 dex in metallicity, and a median [α/M] error of 0.06 dex.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar analysis separating cool giants and dwarfs was done by Li et al (2016). A comparison between the active (black contours) and inactive sample (gray contours) shows a relative lack of cool inactive dwarfs because the majority of stars is active in this region of the color-color diagram.…”
Section: Colors Of Active Starsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More than 99% of the M giants from LAMOST DR4 had search radius less than 3" in the ALLWISE Source Catalog, and we obtained 5 photometric bands for these stars (J,H,K,W1 andW2). The details for our selection criteria are the same as those in Section 3.1 of Li et al (2016).…”
Section: Giant Samplementioning
confidence: 99%