Selecting permit allocation rules for agricultural pollution control: a bargaining solution

Cutting the cake: Supporting environmental fund allocation decisions

“…Other models are primarily concerned with fairness and equity issues and aim to share the resource (Kampas and White, 2003). Yet other models combine both elements of sharing and optimisation (Vesterdal and Svendsen, 2004).…”

Controlling nitrate pollution: An integrated approach

“…2 The issue of transactions costs is treated in Kampas and White (2002) while permit trading is examined in Kampas and White (2003a) and the implications of different probabilistic constraints on permitted emissions are considered in Kampas and White (2003b). Kampas and White (2004) combines both probabilistic constraints and administrative costs within a single framework.…”

Equity-based optimisation of regional water pollutant discharge amount allocation: a case study in the Tai Lake Basin

“…Although no different contributions have been made to improve the efficiency of a reduction in the discharge of pollutants by different initial distribution methods, they have a major impact on the fairness of distribution (Kampas and White 2003). Therefore, some scholars have proposed establishing distribution standards; this process involves a series of indicators, each of a reasonable weight, in which permit distribution volume is directly proportional to the integrated indicator value (Bohm and Larsen 1994), such as the level of discharge by polluters, economic considerations, population, land areas, etc.…”