2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76348-4_63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting Relevant Educational Attributes for Predicting Students’ Academic Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 120 documents were returned, of which 33 articles were selected because they had FS in educational data as their main objective. This set of works utilized a diverse set datasets, namely: student questionnaires [Ahmed et al 2019], data stemming from e-learning platforms [Govindasamy and Velmurugan 2019;Jalota and Agrawal 2021], school databases [Abid et al 2018;Sokkhey and Okazaki 2020] and university graduation departments [Ahmed et al 2020;Chaves et al 2021]. The selected articles can be grouped in accordance with the FS method employed, namely: (i) filtering methods; (ii) wrapper approaches; (iii) embedded approaches; (iv) methods for feature extraction; and (v) FS comparison studies, as summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 120 documents were returned, of which 33 articles were selected because they had FS in educational data as their main objective. This set of works utilized a diverse set datasets, namely: student questionnaires [Ahmed et al 2019], data stemming from e-learning platforms [Govindasamy and Velmurugan 2019;Jalota and Agrawal 2021], school databases [Abid et al 2018;Sokkhey and Okazaki 2020] and university graduation departments [Ahmed et al 2020;Chaves et al 2021]. The selected articles can be grouped in accordance with the FS method employed, namely: (i) filtering methods; (ii) wrapper approaches; (iii) embedded approaches; (iv) methods for feature extraction; and (v) FS comparison studies, as summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DS33 datasets is a Portages secondary students school dataset. The dataset is has been used in different EDM studies [10][11][12]. This is dataset of 395 students taking Mathematics subject.…”
Section: Ds33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, [9] claims CFS subset evaluator as the best feature selection method for predicting the final semester examination performance of students. According to [10] there is no common feature selection method which can be accurate for all datasets even for a common domain. So that there is a need to figure out the important feature selection methods for predicting the performance of students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, [8] claims CFS subset evaluator as the best feature selection method for predicting the final semester examination performance of students. According to [9] there is not one common feature selection method which can be accurate for all datasets even for a common domain. There is a need to focus on the feature selection algorithms in the area of predicting the performance of students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%