2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting reliable physicochemical properties of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) based on molecular descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(100 reference statements)
2
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…for PFOS as for their suggested pK a ranges. This indicated that at least the maximum values of K AW which were suggested by Kim et al [37] would be not supported by our measurement.…”
Section: Estimation Of Pk a From Observed D Awcontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for PFOS as for their suggested pK a ranges. This indicated that at least the maximum values of K AW which were suggested by Kim et al [37] would be not supported by our measurement.…”
Section: Estimation Of Pk a From Observed D Awcontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…(COSMOtherm) to 0.57 (EPI Suite) for PFOA and -2.40 (COSMOtherm) to -0.35 (EPI Suite) for PFOS. Recently, Kim et al [37] who used molar volume as a molecular descriptor suggested K AW values greater than 10 times than the maximum values suggested by previous QSAR-based models ( Table 2).…”
Section: Estimation Of Pk a From Observed D Awmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Nevertheless, it has been reported that the partition coefficient (Kow, for octanol-water) for PFUnDA is higher than that for the other PFASs we studied, thus some PFUnDA could be partitioning into the lipid compartment (Jing et al, 2009; Kim et al, 2015). However in these data, changes in BMI were unrelated to PFAS concentration in the second pregnancy and the change in BMI, when added to the model shown in table 4, did not predict PFAS concentration (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…For example, Bhhatarai and Gramatica conducted an extensive QSPR analysis for PFAS, and showed that aqueous solubility, vapor pressure, and critical micelle concentration (CMC) were all well described by simple QSPR models. Similarly, Kim et al (2015) demonstrated the effectiveness of simple QSPR models for estimating vapor pressures, aqueous solubilities, octanol/water partition coefficients, air/water partition coefficients, and octanol/air partition coefficients of PFAS. Lyu et al (2018) successfully applied QSPR analysis to air-water interfacial adsorption coefficients for a homologous series of perfluoroalkyl carboxylates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Extensive research has demonstrated that a wide range of organic compounds undergo adsorption at air-water interfaces (e.g., Karger et al, 1971; (QSPR) analysis methods can be used to provide empirical-based estimates. This approach is widely used for the estimation of many phase-transfer (partition) coefficients, and it has been applied to PFAS (e.g., Gabriel et al, 1996;Bhhatarai and Gramatica, 2011;Kim et al, 2015;Lyu et al, 2018). For example, Bhhatarai and Gramatica conducted an extensive QSPR analysis for PFAS, and showed that aqueous solubility, vapor pressure, and critical micelle concentration (CMC) were all well described by simple QSPR models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%