2013
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v27i1.8532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the Appropriate Consistency Algorithm for CSPs Using Machine Learning Classifiers

Abstract: Computing the minimal network of a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) is a useful and difficult task. Two algorithms, PerTuple and AllSol, were proposed to this end. The performances of these algorithms vary with the problem instance. We use Machine Learning techniques to build a classifier that predicts which of the two algorithms is likely to be more effective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2012) and solving difficult CSPs with higher levels of consistency (Karakashian, Woodward, and Choueiry 2013). In particular, we are interested in applying AllSol and PerTuple locally to the clusters of a tree decomposition (Geschwender et al 2013). The performance of the two algorithms vary widely in practice: Indeed, one algorithm may finish reasonably fast while the other fails to terminate in a given time threshold.…”
Section: Consistency Algorithms Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012) and solving difficult CSPs with higher levels of consistency (Karakashian, Woodward, and Choueiry 2013). In particular, we are interested in applying AllSol and PerTuple locally to the clusters of a tree decomposition (Geschwender et al 2013). The performance of the two algorithms vary widely in practice: Indeed, one algorithm may finish reasonably fast while the other fails to terminate in a given time threshold.…”
Section: Consistency Algorithms Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%