Selecting the best IDF model by using the multifractal approach

Abstract

In this work, the multifractal properties of hourly rainfall data recorded at a location in Southern Spain have been related to the scale properties of the corresponding intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves. Four parametric models for the IDF curves have been fitted to the quantiles of rainfall obtained using the generalized Pareto frequency distribution function with the extreme data series obtained for the same place. The scaling of the rainfall intensity moments has been analysed, and the empirical moments scaling exponent function has been obtained. The corresponding values of q1 and γ1 have been empirical and theoretically calculated and compared with some characteristics of the different IDF models. Thus, the scaling behaviour of IDF curves has been analysed, and the best model has been selected. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Toward enhanced understanding and projections of climate extremes using physics-guided data mining techniques

“…Improving regional projections (e.g., through variable selection or statistical downscaling) and characterizing natural variability (e.g., irreducible uncertainty at decadal scales: Sutton, 2009, 2011;Branstator and Teng, 2012;Deser et al, 2012a, b;Fischer et al, 2013;Hu and Deser, 2013;Rosner et al, 2014) are necessary for informing adaptation at stakeholder-relevant scales and planning horizons. As climate-related data approaches the scale of hundreds of petabytes (Overpeck et al, 2011) and climate data mining research continues to improve (Smyth et al, 1999;Robertson et al 2004Robertson et al , 2006Khan et al, 2006;Camargo et al, 2007a, b;Gaffney et al, 2007), new opportunities will emerge (e.g., Schneider et al, 2013;Monteleoni et al, 2013;Ganguly et al, 2013). The 2014 Climate Data Initiative (Lehmann, 2014) launched by the White House (United States President's Office) points to big data as a solution for climate adaptation and lends further urgency of the theme discussed in this manuscript.…”

“…However, the value of multimodel averages has been questioned (Knutti, 2010), particularly for regional assessments Kodra et al, 2012). Recent attempts at regional assessments include the development of statistical methods that consider both model performance relative to historical observed data and model ensemble agreement (Smith et al, 2009;Ganguly et al, 2013).…”

“…Network-based graphical models have been used to discover causality among different modes of climate variability (Ebert-Uphoff and Deng, 2012;Runge et al, 2009). Applications of methods in nonlinear data sciences, from complex networks (Steinhaeuser et al, 2011a) to multifractals (García-Marín et al, 2013;Muzy et al, 2006) and dynamic Bayesian networks (Troy et al, 2013), have demonstrated initial promise for better description and predictive insights on climate-related extremes such as extreme monsoonal rainfall over south Asia (Malik et al, 2011). Certain methods may eventually be applicable in a climate change detection context, potentially making similar innovations useful for not only long horizon prediction and uncertainty reduction but also for relatively abrupt change and disturbance analysis or even for early warning systems.…”

Frequency analysis, infilling and trends for extreme precipitation for Jamaica (1895–2100)

“…The Weibull PDF and L-Moments parameter estimation are frequently used in hydrological frequency analysis because of their purported benefits relative to other distributions and parameter estimation techniques (Gaál and Kysely, 2009;García-Marín et al, 2013;Sarkar et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2010;Kharin and Zwiers, 2005;Fowler et al, 2007;Leander et al, 2014). However, the benefits were not consistently observed throughout this analysis as Weibull outperformed the Gumbel in terms of CC and SRC, but underperformed in terms of the bias as shown in the results of Experiment 3 (see Fig.…”

Delimiting homogeneous regions using the multifractal properties of validated rainfall data series

“…One of the most widely used in hydrology is the turbulence formalism developed by Schertzer and Lovejoy (1987) (e.g. Schertzer and Lovejoy, 1988;De Lima and Grasman, 1999;De Lima and de Lima, 2009;García-Marín et al, 2012). This approach assumes that the variability of the process could be directly modeled as a stochastic (or random) turbulent cascade process (Schertzer and Lovejoy, 1987;Gupta and Waymire, 1993;Over and Gupta, 1994;Lovejoy and Schertzer, 1995).…”