Selecting the Correct Weighting Factors for Linear and Quadratic Calibration Curves with Least-Squares Regression Algorithm in Bioanalytical LC-MS/MS Assays and Impacts of Using Incorrect Weighting Factors on Curve Stability, Data Quality, and Assay Performance

Abstract

A simple procedure for selecting the correct weighting factors for linear and quadratic calibration curves with least-squares regression algorithm in bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays is reported. The correct weighting factor is determined by the relationship between the standard deviation of instrument responses (σ) and the concentrations (x). The weighting factor of 1, 1/x, or 1/x(2) should be selected if, over the entire concentration range, σ is a constant, σ(2) is proportional to x, or σ is proportional to x, respectively. For the first time, we demonstrated with detailed scientific reasoning, solid historical data, and convincing justification that 1/x(2) should always be used as the weighting factor for all bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays. The impacts of using incorrect weighting factors on curve stability, data quality, and assay performance were thoroughly investigated. It was found that the most stable curve could be obtained when the correct weighting factor was used, whereas other curves using incorrect weighting factors were unstable. It was also found that there was a very insignificant impact on the concentrations reported with calibration curves using incorrect weighting factors as the concentrations were always reported with the passing curves which actually overlapped with or were very close to the curves using the correct weighting factor. However, the use of incorrect weighting factors did impact the assay performance significantly. Finally, the difference between the weighting factors of 1/x(2) and 1/y(2) was discussed. All of the findings can be generalized and applied into other quantitative analysis techniques using calibration curves with weighted least-squares regression algorithm.

Linearity of Calibration Curves for Analytical Methods: A Review of Criteria for Assessment of Method Reliability

“…The poor chromatography can also be considered as a justification for removing the outlier standard [4].…”

“…The calibration curve standards are prepared by spiking the reference standard solutions to the matrix (e.g. plasma or urine) either freshly or by freezing and storage with QC samples [4]. …”

Immunoaffinity LC–MS/MS for Quantitative Determination of A Free and Total Protein Target as A Target Engagement Biomarker

“…Specificity has been demonstrated for both free and total IP-10 assays as no interference peak was observed in the SRM channel of IP-10 for all of the six different lots of matrix tested. A linear least-squares regression with weighting factor of (1/x 2 ) was used [30]. The representative calibration curves for both free and total assays are shown in Figure 12.…”

An Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Quantification of Vancomycin Requiring Only 2 µL of Rabbit Serum

“…The weighting factor of 1/x 2 was used in the present study, because it provided the lowest variance of the calibration points, particularly at the LLOQ and it was the simplest model to adequately describe the curve [14]. Furthermore, this weighting factor is often used for bioanalytical assays using LC/MS/MS [15].…”