2017
DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2016-084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the Optimal Multidimensional Scaling Procedure for Metric Data With R Environment

Abstract: In multidimensional scaling (MDS) carried out on the basis of a metric data matrix (interval, ratio), the main decision problems relate to the selection of the method of normalization of the values of the variables, the selection of distance measure and the selection of MDS model. The article proposes a solution that allows choosing the optimal multidimensional scaling procedure according to the normalization methods, distance measures and MDS model applied. The study includes 18 normalization methods, 5 dista… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the classic-to-classic approach, an optimal scaling procedure was selected after testing combinations of 6 normalization methods (n1, n2, n3, n5, n5a, n12a see Walesiak, Dudek 2018a), 4 distance measures (Manhattan, Euclidean, Chebyshev, Squared Euclidean, GDM1) and 4 MDS models (ratio, interval, mspline of second and third degree -Borg, Groenen 2005, p. 202)altogether 120 MDS procedures. As a result of applying the optSmacofSym_mMDS function from the mdsOpt R package (see Walesiak, Dudek 2017;2018b), the optimal MDS procedure was selected. The procedure uses the normalization method n2 (positional standardization), the mspline 2 scaling model (polynomial of second degree) and the GDM1 distance.…”
Section: Results Of the Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classic-to-classic approach, an optimal scaling procedure was selected after testing combinations of 6 normalization methods (n1, n2, n3, n5, n5a, n12a see Walesiak, Dudek 2018a), 4 distance measures (Manhattan, Euclidean, Chebyshev, Squared Euclidean, GDM1) and 4 MDS models (ratio, interval, mspline of second and third degree -Borg, Groenen 2005, p. 202)altogether 120 MDS procedures. As a result of applying the optSmacofSym_mMDS function from the mdsOpt R package (see Walesiak, Dudek 2017;2018b), the optimal MDS procedure was selected. The procedure uses the normalization method n2 (positional standardization), the mspline 2 scaling model (polynomial of second degree) and the GDM1 distance.…”
Section: Results Of the Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…matrix ] [ ij x , c) when calculating distances between objects equal weights were adopted for sub-criteria (domains), but differentiated for the variables presented in Table 1. The article uses the mdsOpt package of the R program [Walesiak, Dudek 2017b] allowing the choice of optimal multidimensional scaling procedure in accordance with the procedure presented in the study [Walesiak, Dudek 2017c].…”
Section: Empirical Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution allowing the choice of an optimal multidimensional scaling procedure was used in the article due to the application of the variables normalization method, distance measure and scaling models, according to the procedure presented in [Walesiak, Dudek 2017c]. The procedure available in the mdsOpt package [Walesiak, Dudek 2017b] of R program applies the smacofSym function of the smacof package [Mair et al 2017].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure an optimal procedure of multidimensional scaling, we selected methods of normalising variable values, distance measures, and scaling models according to the procedures (for metric and interval-valued data) available in the mdsOpt package (Walesiak & Dudek 2018b), which employ the smacofSym function from the smacof package (Mair et al 2018). More details about the selection of the optimal procedure of multidimensional scaling can be found in Walesiak & Dudek (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%