1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)44282-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the Patient for Major Ambulatory Surgery: Surgical and Anesthesiology Evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
6

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion criteria were male or female patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, age of 18 years or older at recruitment, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) classification I or II (23), no known relevant allergies, and a signed informed consent letter. Obesity was not considered an exclusion criterion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion criteria were male or female patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, age of 18 years or older at recruitment, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) classification I or II (23), no known relevant allergies, and a signed informed consent letter. Obesity was not considered an exclusion criterion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambulatory surgical care is intended to save health care expenditures, and a gradual practice shift has been described over the past few decades from main operating rooms to day surgery and, finally, from both to office‐based care 6 , 12 , 13 ; however, not all patients are suitable for ambulatory surgical care 5 , 8 , 16 . With this socioeconomic intention, our selection criteria for ambulatory surgical care included the largest possible number of patients with the lowest known risks 5 , 14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the difference in income to cost ratios between blind percutaneous and sonographically guided release is probably much smaller. All cost‐benefit considerations aside, we believe that the potential complications of the different blind percutaneous techniques 5 , 18 , 19 exceed their potential clinical and economic gain; thus, we have not included them in the cost‐effectiveness/efficiency analysis in this work. Further studies should be conducted to verify this theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: male or female patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis; age of 18 years or older at recruitment; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II (23); no known relevant allergies; a signed informed consent letter. Obesity was not considered as an exclusion criterion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%