Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2002
DOI: 10.1145/775047.775053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the right interestingness measure for association patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
410
0
22

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 644 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
410
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, we need measures which assign high weights for relations among specific terms and low weights for relations among generic terms. We can employ similarity (also called quality, interestingness or association) measures to compute relations among terms [7,27]. Different measures calculate the similarity between terms t i and t j (Ω(t i , t j )) considering the information contained in the contingency matrix presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Term Network Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, we need measures which assign high weights for relations among specific terms and low weights for relations among generic terms. We can employ similarity (also called quality, interestingness or association) measures to compute relations among terms [7,27]. Different measures calculate the similarity between terms t i and t j (Ω(t i , t j )) considering the information contained in the contingency matrix presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Term Network Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this new classification problem, each association rule R is seen as a query instance whose target feature value (which is either interesting or uninteresting) is unknown and whose determining features are the interestingness factors having the potential to determine the interestingness of R. There are so many objective interestingness factors influencing the interestingness of association rules, including support, confidence, coverage, strength and size of the rule. In the literature, some of them are also used as objective interestingness measures [35,46]. For instance, support and confidence can alone be used as objective interestingness measures [35,46].…”
Section: Modeling Interestingness As a Classification Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, some of them are also used as objective interestingness measures [35,46]. For instance, support and confidence can alone be used as objective interestingness measures [35,46].…”
Section: Modeling Interestingness As a Classification Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, other technique exist (see [8] for a survey), including statistical methods such as interest ( [9]) and conviction ( [10]) that are often combined with support. We have successfully applied our methods to these, but do not discuss them here for lack of space.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%