2018
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2018.1486739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection and mechanism exploration for salt-tolerant genes in tomato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five candidate genes for salt tolerance in tomato were chosen based on literature. The genes HKT1;1 , WRKY8 , SOS1 and SOS2 were previously shown to be associated with salt tolerance in tomato [ 40 , 73 76 ]. The gene CESA2 was also included as it showed a high homology to AtCESA6 , which is important to salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana [ 77 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five candidate genes for salt tolerance in tomato were chosen based on literature. The genes HKT1;1 , WRKY8 , SOS1 and SOS2 were previously shown to be associated with salt tolerance in tomato [ 40 , 73 76 ]. The gene CESA2 was also included as it showed a high homology to AtCESA6 , which is important to salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana [ 77 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR amplification and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) were performed using S1000 thermal cycler (BIO-RAD, USA) and LightCycler96 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), respectively. β-Tublin was selected as the internal reference gene [26].…”
Section: Determination Of the Genes Expression Related To Sugar Metabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to abiotic stresses such as drought, enzymatic and catalytic activities in plants, such as superoxide dismutase, are altered, which may lead to increased oxidative stress and affect the organism’s growth and development. Eight genes were selected for the validation of the transcriptome analysis’ results ( Figure 9 D), among which GH3.1 ( Potri.001G298300 ), GH3.6 ( Potri.014G136800 ), MADS-box18 ( Potri.003G170000 ), and MADS-box27 ( Potri.009G079000 ) may be involved in root growth and development [ 47 , 48 ], and RGLG2 ( Potri.006G002600 ), PP2C44 ( Potri.008G168400 ), MYB4 ( Potri.002G038500 ), and ASR3 ( Potri.005G193600 ) may play important roles in abiotic stress [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. The results of the qRT-PCR analysis were highly consistent with the RNA-Seq expression trends, indicating that the DEGs identified through the RNA-Seq screening were reliable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%