2004
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-5-55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection and validation of endogenous reference genes using a high throughput approach

Abstract: BackgroundEndogenous reference genes are commonly used to normalize expression levels of other genes with the assumption that the expression of the former is constant in different tissues and in different physiopathological conditions. Whether this assumption is correct it is, however, still matter of debate. In this study, we searched for stably expressed genes in 384 cDNA array hybridization experiments encompassing different tissues and cell lines.ResultsSeveral genes were identified whose expression was hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid a potential bias of quantification against a single housekeeping gene, we selected four different transcripts (HPRT1, CBFB, GAPDH and RPL32) for normalisation purposes (32,33). This group of control transcripts was selected because (1) they showed <10% variability in all of our microarray experiments (data not shown); (2) they were expressed at different steady-state levels and (3) they belong to different metabolic pathways and are thus unlikely to be co-regulated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid a potential bias of quantification against a single housekeeping gene, we selected four different transcripts (HPRT1, CBFB, GAPDH and RPL32) for normalisation purposes (32,33). This group of control transcripts was selected because (1) they showed <10% variability in all of our microarray experiments (data not shown); (2) they were expressed at different steady-state levels and (3) they belong to different metabolic pathways and are thus unlikely to be co-regulated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microarray data were uploaded to the mAdb databank (http://nciarray.nci.nih.gov) and further analysed using Partek (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and BRBArrayTools developed by the Biometric Research Branch, NCI (http://linus.nci.nih.gov/BRB-ArrayTools.html) [25]. The whole gene expression profile consisted of 25100 genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survival analysis, survival risk prediction analysis and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were performed using BRBArrayTools [25]. Univariant Cox proportional hazards models were fit to test individual NK selected gene expression levels for association with survival (Wald test, two-sided).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both, human reference and test total RNA were amplified into antisense RNA in large amounts using identical conditions [14, 15]. Confidence about array quality was confirmed as previously described [16]. For 36 k human array performances, both reference and test aRNA were directly labeled using ULS aRNA Fluorescent Labeling kit (Kreatech) with Cy3 for reference and Cy5 for test samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%