2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58328-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for Gene Expression Studies in Codonopsis pilosula Based on Transcriptome Sequence Data

Abstract: Relative gene expression analyses by RT-qPCR (reverse transcription-quantitative PCR) are highly dependent on the reference genes in normalizing the expression data of target genes. Therefore, inappropriate endogenous control genes will lead to inaccurate target gene expression profiles, and the selection and validation of suitable internal reference genes becomes essential. In this study, we retrieved the commonly used reference genes in transcriptome datasets of Codonopsis pilosula by RNA-Seq (unpublished da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, another algorithm is needed for comprehensive ranking. After reviewing the literature on HKGs, it was determined that 2 types of comprehensive algorithms were mainly used: (1) the primary ranking order was used to calculate the arithmetic average, and then get the final ranking [24,37];…”
Section: Comprehensive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, another algorithm is needed for comprehensive ranking. After reviewing the literature on HKGs, it was determined that 2 types of comprehensive algorithms were mainly used: (1) the primary ranking order was used to calculate the arithmetic average, and then get the final ranking [24,37];…”
Section: Comprehensive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, another algorithm is needed for comprehensive ranking. After reviewing the literature on HKGs, it was determined that 2 types of comprehensive algorithms were predominantly used: (1) according to the primary ranking order, then calculates the arithmetic average to get the final ranking [21,37]; (2) according to the primary ranking order, then calculates the geometric average to get the final ranking. RefFinder [38] is a typical representative (https://www.heartcure.com.au/reffinder /?…”
Section: Comprfinder Algorithm the Requirement Of Comprehensive Analymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement of comprehensive analysis, and the shortcomings of the previous algorithms After evaluating candidate HKGs with the above-mentioned algorithms (geNorm [26], NormFinder [28], BestKeeper [29], and the ΔCt method [27]), it is not surprising that the rankings of candidate genes may vary depending on the algorithm used [30] and thus another algorithm is needed for comprehensive ranking. After reviewing the literature on HKGs, it was determined that 2 types of comprehensive algorithms were mainly used: (1) the primary ranking order was used to calculate the arithmetic average to get the nal ranking [21,37]; (2) using the primary ranking order, the geometric average is then calculated to get the nal ranking. RefFinder [38] is a typical representative (https://www.heartcure.com.au/re nder /?…”
Section: Comprehensive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%