2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-012-9534-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection Assistance for the Evaluation of Geoconstruction Technologies for Transportation Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each of these technologies, the results also include the ratings that indicate the degree of technology establishment and a technology's potential contribution to the Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP 2) Renewal objectives. More details regarding the SHRP 2 project and interpretations of the ratings can be found in Douglas et al (2012a).…”
Section: Figure 5 Selection Results Of Case Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each of these technologies, the results also include the ratings that indicate the degree of technology establishment and a technology's potential contribution to the Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP 2) Renewal objectives. More details regarding the SHRP 2 project and interpretations of the ratings can be found in Douglas et al (2012a).…”
Section: Figure 5 Selection Results Of Case Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology elimination process can be best described as a heuristic process (Douglas et al, 2012a), and the development of reasonable heuristic rules is the core of a reliable selection system. The heuristic rules developed in the proposed selection system are site-and projectspecific characteristics, general limitations and functionality of the ground improvement technologies, and other technical related issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%