2022
DOI: 10.1111/evo.14430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection bias in mutation accumulation

Abstract: Mutation accumulation (MA) experiments, in which de novo mutations are sampled and subsequently characterized, are an essential tool in understanding the processes underlying evolution. In microbial populations, MA protocols typically involve a period of population growth between severe bottlenecks, such that a single individual can form a visible colony. While it has long been appreciated that the action of positive selection during this growth phase cannot be eliminated, it is typically assumed to be negligi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this large set of fitness effects, we constructed environment-specific empirical DFEs (WT data for some environments were previously reported (30)). Since bacterial MA experiments can cause over-sampling of beneficial mutations and under-sampling of deleterious mutations, we used a correction (32) that retains the measured selective effect ( s ) of each mutation, but estimates and corrects for selection bias by changing the frequency of mutations with a given selective effect (Fig. S1A–C, Supplementary Data).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this large set of fitness effects, we constructed environment-specific empirical DFEs (WT data for some environments were previously reported (30)). Since bacterial MA experiments can cause over-sampling of beneficial mutations and under-sampling of deleterious mutations, we used a correction (32) that retains the measured selective effect ( s ) of each mutation, but estimates and corrects for selection bias by changing the frequency of mutations with a given selective effect (Fig. S1A–C, Supplementary Data).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experiment described here, there were approximately 11 generations of growth between each transfer in the MA experiment, where selection could operate to change the frequencies of de novo mutations. To investigate the influence of selection on the estimated DFE, we implemented the method recently developed by Wahl and Agashe [ 37 ] to predict the extent of under- or over-contribution to the DFE for mutations with given selection coefficients, assuming that there is a doubling of cell number for t = 11 generations during mutation accumulation. Based on Eq ( 2 ) in [ 37 ], and assuming a two-sided gamma distribution with parameters specified in Table 4 , the corrected estimate for the frequency of positive effect mutations is q = 0.46 (uncorrected = 0.50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the influence of selection on the estimated DFE, we implemented the method recently developed by Wahl and Agashe [ 37 ] to predict the extent of under- or over-contribution to the DFE for mutations with given selection coefficients, assuming that there is a doubling of cell number for t = 11 generations during mutation accumulation. Based on Eq ( 2 ) in [ 37 ], and assuming a two-sided gamma distribution with parameters specified in Table 4 , the corrected estimate for the frequency of positive effect mutations is q = 0.46 (uncorrected = 0.50). This suggests that selection during mutation accumulation had only a modest impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency distribution of fitness effects may be shifted under hotter temperatures (Xu 2004; Chu et al 2020). However, direct effect of temperature on population growth rate in microbes, where population size limits (bottlenecks) are not imposed per generation, may allow greater opportunity for selection to shift the observed frequency of mutations at hot relative to cool temperatures (Wahl and Agashe 2022), with stronger selection on deleterious mutations under hotter conditions (Berger et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%