2014
DOI: 10.3329/sja.v11i2.18399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection Criteria, Yield Relationship with Component Traits and Grouping of Tropical Japonica, Indica Lines and Derived Hybrids of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Abstract: Forty-five rice lines comprising of thirty derived hybrid lines obtained from ten tropical Japonica, three Indica and two national checks viz. Pusa Basmati 1121 and Sarjoo-52 were evaluated for selection parameters, yield contributing components and genetic divergence. Fifteen quantitative and three qualitative traits were studied from experimentation with randomized block design during Kharif 2011. The phenotypic coefficient of variability was higher than genotypic coefficient of variability for all of the tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high plant biomass could lead to the production of more grains per plant and consequently grain yield per unit area (Table 1). This is in agreement with the results of another research about rice (Soni et al, 2013), cowpea (Hosseinian & Majnoun-Hoseini, 2015) and soybean (Ball et al, 2000). Decreasing grain yield per unit area under drought stress can be largely attributed to considerable reduction in number of grains per plant rather than grain mass (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The high plant biomass could lead to the production of more grains per plant and consequently grain yield per unit area (Table 1). This is in agreement with the results of another research about rice (Soni et al, 2013), cowpea (Hosseinian & Majnoun-Hoseini, 2015) and soybean (Ball et al, 2000). Decreasing grain yield per unit area under drought stress can be largely attributed to considerable reduction in number of grains per plant rather than grain mass (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%