2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-014-1067-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection efficiency of tunnel length and stalk breakage to obtain maize inbred lines resistant to stem borer attack

Abstract: There is not any conclusive result about the most suitable trait for performing pedigree selection for improving maize performance against corn borer attack: tunnel length or stalk breakage. We have used simultaneously both selection traits in the same genetic backgrounds and the objective of the present work has been to compare the suitability of pedigree selection for tunnel length and stalk breakage in order to obtain inbred lines that per se and in hybrid combination show lower stem damage and good agronom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, yield of MAS-pop did not differ significantly from yield presented by PSB-Yield and tunnel lengths of MAS-pop and PSB-TL were similar (Tables 2 and 3). These results validated the positions and effects of QTL for tunnel length detected by Ordás et al (Ordas et al, 2010) and encourage us to persevere in using marker-assisted selectionMAS approaches for simultaneous improvement of yield and resistance to stem borer attack; a task rarely accomplished using conventional breeding tools (Butron et al, 2014;Bohn et al, 2003). However, as resistance to stem tunneling by MCB has been proved to be highly polygenic, based on many genes with small effects that could get undercover in QTL studies, more promising results are expected to be attained if marker-assisted selectionMAS is rather based on genome-wide than on QTL approaches (Foiada et al, 2015;Ordas et al, 2009;Ordas et al, 2010;Samayoa et al, 2015;Samayoa et al, 2014;Jímenez-Galindo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Annals Of Applied Biologysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In fact, yield of MAS-pop did not differ significantly from yield presented by PSB-Yield and tunnel lengths of MAS-pop and PSB-TL were similar (Tables 2 and 3). These results validated the positions and effects of QTL for tunnel length detected by Ordás et al (Ordas et al, 2010) and encourage us to persevere in using marker-assisted selectionMAS approaches for simultaneous improvement of yield and resistance to stem borer attack; a task rarely accomplished using conventional breeding tools (Butron et al, 2014;Bohn et al, 2003). However, as resistance to stem tunneling by MCB has been proved to be highly polygenic, based on many genes with small effects that could get undercover in QTL studies, more promising results are expected to be attained if marker-assisted selectionMAS is rather based on genome-wide than on QTL approaches (Foiada et al, 2015;Ordas et al, 2009;Ordas et al, 2010;Samayoa et al, 2015;Samayoa et al, 2014;Jímenez-Galindo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Annals Of Applied Biologysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…2008; Butrón et al . 2014). Indirect selection for traits genetically correlated with tunnel length and favourably associated with yield could be used instead of direct selection for tunnel length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2008; Butrón et al . 2012, 2014; Samayoa et al . 2014, but diverse studies noted a negative correlation between improved resistance and grain yield (Sandoya et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploitation of the genetic variability of maize for resistance to corn borer attack could be a complement and/or alternative to the use of Bt- corn. Indeed, some breeding programs developed in the Misión Biológica de Galicia (Pontevedra, Spain) have been successful in developing materials with partial resistance to the MCB (Sandoya et al, 2008 ; Butrón et al, 2014 ), although an indirect, undesirable effect was also achieved: yield reduction (Sandoya et al, 2008 ; Butrón et al, 2012 , 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%