2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1600174113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection favors incompatible signaling in bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further showed the occurrence of mutual facultative cooperation between divergent QS alleles (also known as pherotypes) (Fig. 3b, d) [16, 44]. Each pherotype senses only its own signal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We further showed the occurrence of mutual facultative cooperation between divergent QS alleles (also known as pherotypes) (Fig. 3b, d) [16, 44]. Each pherotype senses only its own signal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Over the years several studies have considered the importance of quorum sensing as a control mechanism for public good production [7, 8, 13-15, 27-29]. Work done by You and colleagues has used a similar framework to establish the optimal regulation of quorum sensing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to emergence of cheaters in the population, which do not contribute toward production of the public resource, but gain from benefits from the resource produced by co‐operators in the population. Because the cheaters have a higher fitness than the co‐operators, but cannot survive in the absence of co‐operators, a stable coexistence arises (Perez‐Escudero and Gore 2016; Pollak et al. 2016).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to emergence of cheaters in the population, which do not contribute toward production of the public resource, but gain from benefits from the resource produced by co-operators in the population. Because the cheaters have a higher fitness than the co-operators, but cannot survive in the absence of co-operators, a stable coexistence arises ( Perez-Escudero and Gore 2016 ; Pollak et al 2016 ). Presence of cheaters in an environment has also been shown to have a positive effect in preserving biodiversity in an unstructured space competition experiment between bacteria ( Leinweber et al 2017 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%