1969
DOI: 10.1071/ar9690643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection for crude protein content in Phalaris tuberosa L. I. Response to selection and preliminary studies on correlated responses

Abstract: In a highly variable breeding population of P. tuberosa, marked responses were obtained to three generations of selection for high and low crude protein concentration (percentage nitrogen x 6.25) in whole tillers at heading. Total response was similar in each direction, and realized heritability estimates were h2 = 0.25 and h2 = 0.20 in the high and low directions respectively. The responses were accompanied by positively correlated changes in in vitro digestibility and in characters commonly used as indicator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this knowledge, reports of actual genetic progress in breeding for improved forage digestibility of cool-season forage grasses are limited to orchardgrass (Breese & Davies, 1970;Saiga, 1983;Rind & Carlson, 1988), perennial ryegrass (Humphreys, 1989b), smooth bromegrass (Ehlke et aI., 1986;Carpenter & Casler, 1990), and timothy (Surprenant et aI., 1990). Successful selection for crude protein concentration resulted in positive correlated selection responses for in vitro digestibility (Clements, 1969). Divergent phenotypic selection for neutral detergent fiber concentration, the single best laboratory predictor of intake potential (Van Soest, 1982), was successful in smooth bromegrass (Carpenter & Casler, 1990) and reed canarygrass (Surprenant et aI., 1988).…”
Section: Forage Nutritional Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this knowledge, reports of actual genetic progress in breeding for improved forage digestibility of cool-season forage grasses are limited to orchardgrass (Breese & Davies, 1970;Saiga, 1983;Rind & Carlson, 1988), perennial ryegrass (Humphreys, 1989b), smooth bromegrass (Ehlke et aI., 1986;Carpenter & Casler, 1990), and timothy (Surprenant et aI., 1990). Successful selection for crude protein concentration resulted in positive correlated selection responses for in vitro digestibility (Clements, 1969). Divergent phenotypic selection for neutral detergent fiber concentration, the single best laboratory predictor of intake potential (Van Soest, 1982), was successful in smooth bromegrass (Carpenter & Casler, 1990) and reed canarygrass (Surprenant et aI., 1988).…”
Section: Forage Nutritional Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decline in protein is slower in leaf than in stem. In P. aquatica, protein content is closely correlated with digestibility during plant growth from heading to seed dispersal and tiller death (Clements 1969). At the heading stage, protein content shows significant heritable variation (Clements 1969(Clements , 1973a.…”
Section: Water-soluble Carbohydratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant positive correlations between digestibility and WSC concentration in tall fescue forage have been reported (Burns and Smith, 1980). Bugge (1978), in Italian ryegrass, and Clements (1969), using canarygrass, found no significant correlation between DMD and WSC. Strong positive phenotypic and genotypic correlation between WSC and DMD were obtained by Jafari (1998), Jafari et al (2003) in ryegrass, Jafari and Naseri (2007) in cocksfoot, Jafari and Javarsineh (2005) in tall fescue ( …”
Section: Correlation Between Wsc and Digestibility (Dmd)mentioning
confidence: 89%