2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection Has Countered High Mutability to Preserve the Ancestral Copy Number of Y Chromosome Amplicons in Diverse Human Lineages

Abstract: Amplicons-large, highly identical segmental duplications-are a prominent feature of mammalian Y chromosomes. Although they encode genes essential for fertility, these amplicons differ vastly between species, and little is known about the selective constraints acting on them. Here, we develop computational tools to detect amplicon copy number with unprecedented accuracy from high-throughput sequencing data. We find that one-sixth (16.9%) of 1,216 males from the 1000 Genomes Project have at least one deleted or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
79
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
10
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectively, our results suggest that Sdic CNV in contemporary populations of D. melanogaster secures a minimal necessary expression level across different genomic backgrounds and sexual selection regimes, serving also as a substrate to prevent nucleotide change via gene conversion and NAHR events for essentially all the Sdic repeat but the two most 3′ exons and the 3′-UTR of Sdic copies ( Rozen et al. 2003 ; Teitz et al. 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collectively, our results suggest that Sdic CNV in contemporary populations of D. melanogaster secures a minimal necessary expression level across different genomic backgrounds and sexual selection regimes, serving also as a substrate to prevent nucleotide change via gene conversion and NAHR events for essentially all the Sdic repeat but the two most 3′ exons and the 3′-UTR of Sdic copies ( Rozen et al. 2003 ; Teitz et al. 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In contrast, we found that intermediate CN values are prevalent, that differences in the aggregate transcript abundance are not correlated with CNV in a geographically diverse set of strains, and that significantly increased Sdic expression as a result of artificially doubling CN does not result in enhanced sperm competitive ability based on progeny contribution in double-mating assays. The prevalence of individuals bearing intermediate CN values could result from a scenario of stabilizing selection, or from a mutation-drift equilibrium coupled with the action of purifying selection sculpting the range boundaries as proposed for some multigene families in mammals ( Hollox 2008 ; Teitz et al. 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high level of variation in RBMY1 copy number (second on the Y chromosome only to TSPY (24)) has been well established by previous studies in several populations such as the UK (12), Denmark (13), China (17) and worldwide samples (14,15) including those from the 1000 Genomes Project (16,19). The data were generated using diverse techniques: array CGH (12,19), sequencing (14–16,19) or ddPCR (17), and thus this conclusion, confirmed by the present work, is well established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Given that partial AZFc deletions perturb AZFc gene dosage, we were interested in analyzing the role of an increased gene dosage (>4 for DAZ and >2 for CDY1, respectively) due to partial duplications. Although case/ control association studies failed to reach to a univocal conclusion in respect to the hypothetical "optimal" AZFc gene dosage needed for normal spermatogenesis [27,30,34,35], it seems that a positive selection for an "optimal" gene dosage does exist (four DAZ and two CDY1 copies) during evolution [36]. Hence, our working hypothesis was a possible predisposing effect of AZFc dosage variation (not only deficit but also an excess) to TGCT development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%