1973
DOI: 10.4141/cjas73-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection Intensity and Response to Selection for Yearling Weight in Beef Cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thompson & Juga (1989) showed that the method of Newman et al (1973) is biased downwards as a result of a reduction in variance due to linkage disequilibrium (Bulmer, 1971) and proposed a recursive method to estimate realized heritabilities. Reporting on a selection experiment with sheep, Johnson et al (1995) found lowest realized heritabilities estimated by the method of Newman et al (1973) followed by those estimated using the method of Thompson & Juga (1989) which were similar to, but still lower than, the REML estimates. The low selection response for weaning weight was due to the low REML heritability estimate which was influenced by the presence of sire x year interaction (Beffa et al, 2009b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thompson & Juga (1989) showed that the method of Newman et al (1973) is biased downwards as a result of a reduction in variance due to linkage disequilibrium (Bulmer, 1971) and proposed a recursive method to estimate realized heritabilities. Reporting on a selection experiment with sheep, Johnson et al (1995) found lowest realized heritabilities estimated by the method of Newman et al (1973) followed by those estimated using the method of Thompson & Juga (1989) which were similar to, but still lower than, the REML estimates. The low selection response for weaning weight was due to the low REML heritability estimate which was influenced by the presence of sire x year interaction (Beffa et al, 2009b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct and correlated cumulative selection differentials (CSD) were calculated within the control lines using the method of Newman et al (1973) where an individual's selection differential, calculated as a deviation from the mean performance of its contemporary group, is added to the mean accumulated selection differential of all parents contributing progeny to the group. Only pre-weaning weight and weight gain traits were considered as males selected to be parents were managed separately post-weaning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cattle in the second study consisted of 48 purebred Shorthorn cows ranging in age from 2 to l0 yr and their calves. Twenty-three of these cows belonged to a line that had been selected for yearling weight for a total of 14 yr and the other 25 were from a nonselected control line (Newman et al 1973 (Tilakaratne et al 1980), higher concentration of T3 and T4 (Land et al 1983), and higher level of glucose (Flux et al 1984) For personal use only. (Smith and Goodman 1970) in chickens and to growth rate and milk production in mice (Yamaki and Mizuma 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response to yearling weight selection has been documented by Newman et al (1973) from the data used in this study. All the data were included in one data set even though more than one location was used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%