2016
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.1022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection is stronger in early-versus-late stages of divergence in a Neotropical livebearing fish

Abstract: How selection acts to drive trait evolution at different stages of divergence is of fundamental importance in our understanding of the origins of biodiversity. Yet, most studies have focused on a single point along an evolutionary trajectory. Here, we provide a case study evaluating the strength of divergent selection acting on life-history traits at early-versus-late stages of divergence in Brachyrhaphis fishes. We find that the difference in selection is stronger in the early-diverged population than the lat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BR and BT have recently emerged as a useful system for studying patterns of trait divergence in recently diverged species that occur in different selective environments (Ingley, , ; Ingley & Johnson, , b). Previous work has shown that these species diverge in numerous traits, such as behaviour and morphology, which correspond to different predation environments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BR and BT have recently emerged as a useful system for studying patterns of trait divergence in recently diverged species that occur in different selective environments (Ingley, , ; Ingley & Johnson, , b). Previous work has shown that these species diverge in numerous traits, such as behaviour and morphology, which correspond to different predation environments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of the Neotropical livebearing fish genus Brachyrhaphis (Poeciliidae) have received increased attention in ecology and evolution research in recent years (Johnson & Zuniga‐Vega, ; Ingley et al ., , ) and are useful for examining how trade‐offs evolve in different lineages within the same clade, but that are found at different stages of divergence (Ingley, Rehm & Johnson, ; Ingley & Johnson, , b). Several species within Brachyrhaphis contain populations that occur in divergent predation environments, and have repeatedly and independently evolved life‐history (Johnson, ; Jennions & Telford, ), morphological (Wesner et al ., ; Ingley et al ., ), and behavioural (Archard & Braithwaite, ; Ingley et al ., , c) adaptations to their respective environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual variation can enhance biodiversity across multiple trophic levels (Crutsinger et al., ), cause populations to rebound more quickly from biotic disturbances (Randall Hughes & Stachowicz, ), or even accelerate the rate with which invasive species spread across landscapes (Brown, Phillips, & Shine, ; Fogarty, Cote, & Sih, ; Phillips, Brown, Webb, & Shine, ). Predator–prey interactions, which are our focus here, are known to play a large role in structuring prey population dynamics, community structure, and space use (Addicott, ; Hammill, Atwood, Corvalan, & Srivastava, ; Holt, ; Ingley & Johnson, ,), and several recent studies have shown that the traits of individual predators and prey can influence the outcome of their interaction (McGhee, Pintor, & Bell, ; Pruitt, Stachowicz, & Sih, ; Smith & Blumstein, ). However, predicting under what conditions individual variation will have its largest effects is still challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local adaptation has long been a central topic in ecology and evolution because adaptive, specialized traits can allow species to expand into new environments, which in turn can help promote diversification (Coyne & Orr, 2004;Funk, 1998;Rundle & Nosil, 2005;Sandoval & Nosil, 2005;Schluter, 2000). Populations that occur in different selective regimes often become locally adapted to their native environment, sometimes resulting in phenotypic trade-offs (i.e., negative correlations among beneficial traits) in one or more ecologically relevant, fitness determining traits (Agrawal, Conner, & Rasmann, 2010;Ingley & Johnson, 2016a, 2016bJoshi & Thompson, 1995;Schluter, 2000;Via, Bouck, & Skillman, 2000). These trade-offs may then lead to the emergence of closely related populations that differ substantially in one or more traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%