2008
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.090118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection Mapping of Loci for Quantitative Disease Resistance in a Diverse Maize Population

Abstract: The selection response of a complex maize population improved primarily for quantitative disease resistance to northern leaf blight (NLB) and secondarily for common rust resistance and agronomic phenotypes was investigated at the molecular genetic level. A tiered marker analysis with 151 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in 90 individuals of the population indicated that on average six alleles per locus were available for selection. An improved test statistic for selection mapping was developed, in which qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods for identifying selection in these artificially selected populations may include any of the methods utilized for natural populations, but a benefit of these types of studies is that samples of the progenitor population are frequently available, which allows for direct measurement of allele frequency changes. Separation of selection vs. genetic drift effects has been performed by comparing allele frequencies to simulations of drift (Wisser et al 2008) and by developing significance tests based on replicated or control populations (Parts et al 2011;Turner et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Methods for identifying selection in these artificially selected populations may include any of the methods utilized for natural populations, but a benefit of these types of studies is that samples of the progenitor population are frequently available, which allows for direct measurement of allele frequency changes. Separation of selection vs. genetic drift effects has been performed by comparing allele frequencies to simulations of drift (Wisser et al 2008) and by developing significance tests based on replicated or control populations (Parts et al 2011;Turner et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, plant species have the advantage that remnant seeds representing a population before selection began often remain available for years or decades following the selection process itself (e.g., Odhiambo and Compton 1987). This characteristic was utilized by Wisser et al (2008), who compared marker data gathered from samples before and after several generations of selection to identify loci affecting northern leaf blight resistance in closed populations of maize that had undergone selection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the assessment of allele frequency change is a useful technique for identifying genomic regions that were targeted by selection (Lewontin 1962). Specific methods vary depending on the populations under study and the genotyping methods employed (Wright 1951;Akey et al 2002;Sabeti et al 2002;Oleksyk et al 2008;Wisser et al 2008;Turner et al 2011). For example, in natural populations, statistics that measure population divergence such as F ST (Wright 1951) can be calculated and loci displaying extreme values above an empirically determined genome-wide threshold are implicated as potentially associated with selection (Akey et al 2002;Oleksyk et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many of these factors, appropriate tests for selection have been developed and are in wide use. For instance, in cases of directed evolution with experimental populations, especially for those with biological replication, changes in allele frequency may be directly measured to identify single-locus selection (Wisser et al, 2008;Turner et al, 2011;Parts et al, 2011;Hirsch et al, 2014). In a related test, which is particularly useful if samples from pre-selection populations are not available, patterns of nucleotide variability between vs within populations may be leveraged to identify selection at a single locus (Lewontin and Krakauer, 1973;Akey et al, 2002;Beissinger et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%