Selection of a Field Testing Method for Karst Rock Mass Deformability by Multi Criteria Decision Analysis

Abstract

The rock mass deformation modulus is an essential parameter for any numerical analysis and prediction of deformation in geotechnical engineering. Experience acquired using a large number of geotechnical projects in Croatia and the world indicates a somewhat unreliable determination of rock mass deformability based on correlation of classification results. The method of field testing for deformability can provide a more reliable insight into rock mass behaviour under loading conditions. The paper presents the most frequently used methods for field testing rock deformability. The benefits and disadvantages are shown of each particular method used in determining criteria and forming a ranking list of test methods using the multi criteria decision analysis. This ranking list of terrain testing for the rock mass stiffness is acquired on the basis of set criteria, assumes guidelines for compiling an exploratory works plan necessary for designing complex geotechnical structures in karst. Appropriate analyses of the sensitivity to changes in the significance of particular criteria was carried out including its effect on selecting the field method for testing karst rock mass deformability. Keywords: karst, deformability, field testing method, multi criteria analysis, AHP. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Marčić, D.; Cerić, A.; Kovačević, M. S. 2013. Selection of a field testing method for karst rock mass deformability by multi criteria decision analysis, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19(2): 196Á205.

Seismic Performance Sensitivity Analysis to Random Variables for Cable Tray System

“…Once this is done, sensitivity analysis could be used to assign this uncertainty to the input random variables. Sensitivity analysis problems are essentially different, hence different methods have been proposed for their solutions (Saltelli et al, 2004) (e.g., reliability analysis for geotechnical tasks (Marčić et al, 2013), different forms of structures (Sousa et al, 2015;Yang, 2007;Kala, 2011) or sustainable building assessments (Šiožinytė & Antuchevičienė, 2013;Prasad et al, 2015;Antucheviciene et al, 2015)). The use of sensitivity analysis in this paper will focus on identifying which input random variables contribute the most to model uncertainty and random variables in very little contributions and can potentially be fixed.…”

Global Sensitivity Analysis in Stability Problems of Steel Frame Structures

“…Saltelli et al 2004). Regarding issues of reliability in the building industry, sensitivity analysis is a significant part of reliability analysis of geotechnical tasks (Marčić et al 2013), masonry systems (Sousa et al 2015), concrete structures (Yang 2007), and steel structures (Kala 2011b;Kamiński, Świta 2014). Sensitivity analysis can be also a significant component of multicriteria decision-making techniques for sustainable building assessment (Siozinyte, Antucheviciene 2013;Prasad et al 2015;Antucheviciene et al 2015).…”

Primjena bespilotnih letjelica na prometnoj infrastrukturnoj mreži

“…According to their type, Croatian karst areas are classified as the karst of moderate spreading (Dinarides, Alps, Pyrenees, Appalachian Mountains, Australian mountains, etc.) characterized by up to 8 km thick carbonate Mesozoic and Palaeogene sediments which, in addition to pronounced tectonic fracturing, contributes to similar spreading of both horizontal and vertical forms (speleological structures) [3,4]. In Croatia, karst spreads from Slovenia in the northwest to Montenegro in the southeast, while its northern boundary runs from Karlovac toward the east, crossing into Bosnia and Herzegovina [5,6].…”