Owing to geometrical degrees of freedom, low cost, and ease of realizing complex structures polymer additive manufacturing has emerged exceptionally well. Even with rapid evolutionary growth additive manufacturing lacks sound quality mainly including inherent porosity and surface roughness compared to their counterparts (conventional manufacturing processes) due to the involvement of several printing parameters in AM processes. This quality‐based comparative assessment presents the influence of build /layer height on the porosity (using Micro‐X ray Computed Tomography) and surface roughness (in build direction) of additively manufactured Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) (due to its versatile properties in applications like wearable electronics and biomedical) using three different polymer additive manufacturing processes namely SLS (Selective Laser Sintering), FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling), and SLA (Stereolithography). Along with porosity, an in‐depth pores characterization is also performed to understand the geometrical feature and severity of pores present in each sample of the AM process. Results were compared at last to make concluding remarks.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.