1982
DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(82)90029-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of a trip table which reproduces observed link flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption causes an inconsistency issue in congested networks, because the predetermined assignment matrix may not be replicated when the estimated O-D table is assigned onto the network according to some route choice assumptions. A conventional way to resolve this inconsistency is to introduce a traffic assignment component into the estimation problem (see, e.g., Nguyen 1977;Gur et al 1980;LeBlanc and Farhangian 1982;Nguyen 1984;Fisk 1984Fisk , 1988Yang et al 1992;Yang 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption causes an inconsistency issue in congested networks, because the predetermined assignment matrix may not be replicated when the estimated O-D table is assigned onto the network according to some route choice assumptions. A conventional way to resolve this inconsistency is to introduce a traffic assignment component into the estimation problem (see, e.g., Nguyen 1977;Gur et al 1980;LeBlanc and Farhangian 1982;Nguyen 1984;Fisk 1984Fisk , 1988Yang et al 1992;Yang 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the model did not provide a unique solution. This method was subsequently extended (Turnquist et al, 1979;LeBlanc et al, 1982;Sheffi et al, 1987), however, the extended method requires accurate knowledge of the link travel times and of the relationship between link volume and link travel time.…”
Section: 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such strategies are appealing when evaluation of the regional network 23 requires specialized expertise and/or is very computationally demanding, thus prohibiting 24 evaluation of one or more scenarios in a limited time frame. These simplified networks provide 25 planners with a less complex platform to facilitate quick-response and relatively informed 26 decision making early on. 27 While a number of studies addressed important theoretical and practical extraction/aggregation 28 issues for network abstraction (see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], subnetwork analysis is still quite limited (see 9, 10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 1.4 (Basis matrix updating): Update the basic feasible path flow variables by 26 and update the basis matrix by inserting the entering path's link-path incidence 27 vector and removing the leaving path's link-path incidence vector. comparing it to that generated by the full-network traffic assignment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%