1941
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1941.0155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of Anterior Teeth for Artificial Dentures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
2

Year Published

1954
1954
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
18
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Abbreviations: BrN-BaN: Distance from bridge of the nose to the base of the nose AMH: Actual measured height of the maxillary right central incisor Pound [42] suggested that the bizygomatic width divided by 16 and the distance from the hairline to the lower edge of the bone of the chin, also divided by 16 provides the width and length of the maxillary central incisors respectively. In addition the outline form of the fingernail [12], incisive papilla [8], alae of the nose [44], patient photographs [45] have all been suggested as possible guides to the selection of maxillary central incisor. The golden proportion, when applied to the dentition, indicates that if the perceived width of each anterior tooth is approximately 62% the size of its adjacent anterior tooth, then it is considered aesthetically pleasing [46][47][48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbreviations: BrN-BaN: Distance from bridge of the nose to the base of the nose AMH: Actual measured height of the maxillary right central incisor Pound [42] suggested that the bizygomatic width divided by 16 and the distance from the hairline to the lower edge of the bone of the chin, also divided by 16 provides the width and length of the maxillary central incisors respectively. In addition the outline form of the fingernail [12], incisive papilla [8], alae of the nose [44], patient photographs [45] have all been suggested as possible guides to the selection of maxillary central incisor. The golden proportion, when applied to the dentition, indicates that if the perceived width of each anterior tooth is approximately 62% the size of its adjacent anterior tooth, then it is considered aesthetically pleasing [46][47][48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…''Anthropometric Cephalic Index Method,'' projected by Sears in 1941 [16]. This was based on the fact that width of the upper central incisor could be determined by dividing either the transverse circumference of the head by 13 ( Fig.…”
Section: History Of Anterior Teeth Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relationship between the shapes of the tooth and face differing from this were obtained in the studies of Wolfart et al, 22 in which the square shape was the one that generated the greatest similarities. In the studies of Seluk et al, 10 Varjão et al, 11 Sellen et al, 14 Mavroskoufis and Ritchie 15 and Sears, 23 no associations were observed between the shapes of the tooth and face.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…23 It was also not possible to make any statistical association between the tooth shape, gender and the pleasant appearance of the images of the smile. This may suggest that, in some way, the arrangement and composition of the anterior teeth have a greater influence on esthetics, and this would justify the size of the tooth and its disposition being more important than its shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%