2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40032-018-0481-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of Commercially Available Electric Vehicle using Fuzzy AHP-MABAC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It evaluates the corresponding strengths and weaknesses of each alternative over its competitors with reference to each criterion under consideration. This method is adopted based on the following procedural steps (Chatterjee et al , 2017; Biswas and Das, 2018; Roy et al , 2018; Biswas and Das, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It evaluates the corresponding strengths and weaknesses of each alternative over its competitors with reference to each criterion under consideration. This method is adopted based on the following procedural steps (Chatterjee et al , 2017; Biswas and Das, 2018; Roy et al , 2018; Biswas and Das, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, in the problem of choosing BEVs for private individuals, Ziemba [19] used the NEAT F-PROMETHEE method representing uncertain values as trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TFNs). Biswas and Das [34] used the crisp MABAC method to build the BEVs ranking, and the criteria weights were defined by the fuzzy AHP method based on TrFNs. Babar et al [35] used SWOT analysis and fuzzy linear programming with TrFNs to select the appropriate EV type for developing countries, in particular considering the case of Pakistan.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the fuzzy positive-ideal solution (FPIS) and fuzzy negative-ideal solution (FNIS) are calculated according to the Formulas ( 32) and (33), and the distances of alternatives from FPIS and FNIS using Formulas (34) and (35):…”
Section: Fuzzy Topsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the fuzzy MABAC approach was implemented for solving decision-making problems encountered in various fields. The main focal points of these papers can be summarized as follows: evaluation of the efficiency of social media using (Sun et al, 2019;Bobar et al, 2020), Risk assessment of rockburst (Liang et al, 2019), Assessment of undergraduate teaching (Gong et al, 2019), strategy selection for health tourism (Büyüközkan et al, 2020), the selection of location for the construction of single-span bailey bridge (Božanić et al, 2019), green supplier selection (Zhang et al, 2021), Selection of fire position of mortar units (Jokić et al, 2021), Selection of commercially available electric vehicle (Biswas & Das, 2019). As a result, studies focusing on logistics villages from the perspective of logistics companies and operators' preferences are limited.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%