2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13033-015-0024-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of depression measures for use among Vietnamese populations in primary care settings: a scoping review

Abstract: Depression is an important and growing contributor to the burden of disease around the world and evidence suggests the experience of depression varies cross-culturally. Efforts to improve the integration of services for depression in primary care are increasing globally, meaning that culturally valid measures that are acceptable for use in primary care settings are needed. We conducted a scoping review of 27 studies that validated or used 10 measures of depression in Vietnamese populations. We reviewed the val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CES-D is scored on a Likert scale from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time). CES-D scores can range from 0–60, and a score of ≥16 is used to indicate the need for further assessment of clinical depression [21, 24]. This scale has been shown to have internal reliability and construct and criterion validity when used among HIV-positive patients [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CES-D is scored on a Likert scale from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time). CES-D scores can range from 0–60, and a score of ≥16 is used to indicate the need for further assessment of clinical depression [21, 24]. This scale has been shown to have internal reliability and construct and criterion validity when used among HIV-positive patients [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion criteria for the study were: (1) a score of > 7 on the SRQ-20, indicating probable depression caseness [12]; (2) completion of written informed consent and agreement to complete study outcome measures. Exclusion criteria were: (1) cognitive impairment based on patient history; (2) symptoms of psychosis, severe depression or suicidal ideation; (3) impaired vision or hearing; (4) illiteracy.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item of the SRQ-20 can be scored at 0 or 1, with 1 indicating that the symptom was present during the past month. The SRQ-20 was selected based on a review of depression measures that have been previously used and validated in Vietnamese populations, where it was found to be the most appropriate measure [12]. It has previously been found to be valid and appropriate for use by lay health workers in LMICs [14].…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are confident, however, that the work we conducted during the feasibility study, including a review of depression measures that have been validated for use in Vietnam and among Vietnamese populations [25] and the validation of the Antidepressant Skills Workbook , support the appropriateness and validity of these measure and tools for use in Vietnam. While the CAGE was not used during the feasibility study, it has been validated for use in many countries, including low-income settings [39] and has been used by Tran et al [40] in a study of the interaction of perinatal common mental disorders, alcohol use and domestic violence in Vietnam.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome measure will be the SRQ-20 Vietnamese version [22]. We selected the SRQ-20 as the most suitable measure following an extensive review of existing measures for depression [25]. The SRQ-20 has been carefully developed for use in Vietnam, it has been adapted to address culturally appropriate manifestations of depression symptomatology and its validity has been tested in studies within Vietnam [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%