Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This paper analyzes the use of a cyclic solvent injection technique (CSI) as a non-thermal EOR alternative to cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) for increasing the heavy oil recovery in a shallow reservoir located at the middle Magdalena basin in Colombia. A pilot well with less than 30% of water-cut and 10.9 °API was selected. Heavy natural gasoline of 30 °API obtained from the same reservoir was injected by using nitrogen (N2) as dispersing gas. Three procedures were performed being the procedure A, a Solvent slug injection of 60 bbl through the annular pushed and dispersed by 46,444 m3 (1,640 Mscf) of N2 immiscible (considering the low reservoir pressure). The procedure B consisted of injecting the same Solvent volume, but this time pushed by a third part of the N2 injected previously 15,481 m3 (547 Mscf). The procedure C consisted of only inject the same N2 volume than B procedure to analyze the heavy oil response without Solvent. There were collected production data, °API (by hydrometer), gas-flow and gas-gravity values using a liquid level software. Knowing the °API of each component in the laboratory—Solvent and heavy oil—the Solvent concentration from the real °API produced in production stages was calculated. All procedures had 48 hours of soaking, followed by a flowing process to tank to carefully release the excess of N2 before starting the production stage, avoiding gas lock issues. Without considering the Solvent injected, incremental oil production in procedure A was 232 bbl, in procedure B was 120 bbl and for procedure C, incremental oil only reached 11 bbl. With the last result it was determined the N2 injection by itself as a production mechanism without the Solvent effect in the in-situ heavy oil had a negligible effect on incremental oil. The gas-gravity showed the gas composition became heavier along the time, this considering the high-frequency N2 injections swept the methane near the well, requiring more time to produce the N2 traces from the porous media. The excess of N2 as a heavy Solvent dispersing mechanism does not warrant a better dilution effect since as observed in A and B procedures, Solvent concentration in the early production stage never dropped below 35% (17 °API), regardless of the N2 volume injected in the first two days. Finally, although A procedure had more incremental oil production (+93% than B), less N2 injected in B procedure was more efficient (+55% than A) regarding the incremental oil and N2 injected ratio (ONR).
This paper analyzes the use of a cyclic solvent injection technique (CSI) as a non-thermal EOR alternative to cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) for increasing the heavy oil recovery in a shallow reservoir located at the middle Magdalena basin in Colombia. A pilot well with less than 30% of water-cut and 10.9 °API was selected. Heavy natural gasoline of 30 °API obtained from the same reservoir was injected by using nitrogen (N2) as dispersing gas. Three procedures were performed being the procedure A, a Solvent slug injection of 60 bbl through the annular pushed and dispersed by 46,444 m3 (1,640 Mscf) of N2 immiscible (considering the low reservoir pressure). The procedure B consisted of injecting the same Solvent volume, but this time pushed by a third part of the N2 injected previously 15,481 m3 (547 Mscf). The procedure C consisted of only inject the same N2 volume than B procedure to analyze the heavy oil response without Solvent. There were collected production data, °API (by hydrometer), gas-flow and gas-gravity values using a liquid level software. Knowing the °API of each component in the laboratory—Solvent and heavy oil—the Solvent concentration from the real °API produced in production stages was calculated. All procedures had 48 hours of soaking, followed by a flowing process to tank to carefully release the excess of N2 before starting the production stage, avoiding gas lock issues. Without considering the Solvent injected, incremental oil production in procedure A was 232 bbl, in procedure B was 120 bbl and for procedure C, incremental oil only reached 11 bbl. With the last result it was determined the N2 injection by itself as a production mechanism without the Solvent effect in the in-situ heavy oil had a negligible effect on incremental oil. The gas-gravity showed the gas composition became heavier along the time, this considering the high-frequency N2 injections swept the methane near the well, requiring more time to produce the N2 traces from the porous media. The excess of N2 as a heavy Solvent dispersing mechanism does not warrant a better dilution effect since as observed in A and B procedures, Solvent concentration in the early production stage never dropped below 35% (17 °API), regardless of the N2 volume injected in the first two days. Finally, although A procedure had more incremental oil production (+93% than B), less N2 injected in B procedure was more efficient (+55% than A) regarding the incremental oil and N2 injected ratio (ONR).
The paper presents the results of lab and filtration studies aimed at improving the procedure of thermal/gas/chemical effect (TGCE) with the generation of thermogenic system in reservoir conditions, proposed as an alternative to the methods of increasing oil recovery, such as water-gas effect procedure and foam injection process. The objects of research were thermal/gas generating compositions at the basis of sodium salts of sulfamic and nitric acids. Moreover, the influence of the ionic composition of the aqueous solution and temperature on the surface properties of the attracted solutions of surfactants (surfactants) was also evaluated. Filtration tests have shown that the use of a thermal/gas generating composition leads to additional displacement of high-viscous oil. The introduction of surfactants in the thermal/gas generating composition promotes foaming in the porous medium of the reservoir model and prevents gas breakthrough that leads to an increase in the oil displacement factor up to 24 %.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.