2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02706896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of mass transfer correlations for rate based liquid-liquid extraction model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bulk concentration on each tray is assumed constant, that is, the concentrations of components in both phases do not change within the static and dynamic holdup. Sanpui and Khanna (2002) have suggested that the parallel-parallel mass-transfer resistance model matches well with the experimental results. A summary of the parallel masstransfer-resistance model is given below.…”
Section: Mass-transfer Resistance Modelsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bulk concentration on each tray is assumed constant, that is, the concentrations of components in both phases do not change within the static and dynamic holdup. Sanpui and Khanna (2002) have suggested that the parallel-parallel mass-transfer resistance model matches well with the experimental results. A summary of the parallel masstransfer-resistance model is given below.…”
Section: Mass-transfer Resistance Modelsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It has been observed that Skelland and Conger (1973) (for k ij of stagnant drops), Wesselingh and Krishna (1990) (for D ij ), and Siddiqi and Lucas (1986) (for D ij 0 ) as suggested by Sanpui and Khanna (2002) are the best combination for the TAW and MAW systems.…”
Section: Superscripts and Subscriptsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Drops were spaced more than 60 mm apart, typically with a range of flow-rate between 20.54-120.23 mL/h. Acetone concentration in the collected samples was measured with a GC (Shimadzu, 14B) with FID detector, calibrated with reference substances of toluene and acetone (Merck) for gas chromatography [12,21,28]. The concentration of acetone in the known samples was within the range of 1.5-44.7 g/L with 14 samples in calibration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A list of the published correlations for the mass transfer coefficients for the circulating drops has been provided by Sanpui and Khanna [21]. Lochiel and Calderbank [22] developed a model describing the transfer of solutes, around a spherical drop when the Schmidt number is large, i.e., Sc>>1 (about 930 in this work),…”
Section: Combined Mass Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%